1992
DOI: 10.1381/096089292765560501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obesity: an indication rather than contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Abstract: Obesity was originally designated as a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy; however, as experience in the procedure develops, it is evolving into an indication. Out of the first 325 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 91 were determined to be either obese or morbidly obese. Group I (normal body habitus), consisted of 228 patients, group II (obese) 67 patients, and group III (morbidly obese) 24 patients. Six patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up data. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cholecystectomy itself is no more difficult in obese patients, and a number of authors have suggested that the laparoscopic approach is better suited to patients with high BMIs than is the open approach. 7,15,17,25 The main advantages to performing LC as a day case, and therefore the driving force behind expansion of day case services, are improved patient satisfaction and improved recovery and reductions in the risk of hospital acquired infections and thromboembolic complications, as well as a reduction in the costs associated with hospital inpatient stay and the demand for inpatient beds. 12,13,28 The total cost estimate obtained from the finance department in the trust is £1986 for a day case LC, which increases to £3006 in the event of an overnight stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cholecystectomy itself is no more difficult in obese patients, and a number of authors have suggested that the laparoscopic approach is better suited to patients with high BMIs than is the open approach. 7,15,17,25 The main advantages to performing LC as a day case, and therefore the driving force behind expansion of day case services, are improved patient satisfaction and improved recovery and reductions in the risk of hospital acquired infections and thromboembolic complications, as well as a reduction in the costs associated with hospital inpatient stay and the demand for inpatient beds. 12,13,28 The total cost estimate obtained from the finance department in the trust is £1986 for a day case LC, which increases to £3006 in the event of an overnight stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were divided into four groups based on their BMI: less than 25 was not performed in any of the patients. The patients were followed up at 4-6 weeks postoperatively, either in the outpatient department by the operating surgeon or via a telephone call by a nurse specialist using a list of specified questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early on in the LC era, morbid obesity was considered a contraindication [3]. Over time this has changed, and LC is now considered acceptable in morbidly obese patients [11,24]. Although some suggest that special techniques are to be employed in obese patients [13], others argue that increased experience with obese patients has led to the increased feasibility of LC in obese patients [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, obese patients were excluded from this approach, the larger body habitus was thought to decrease safety of the procedure [7,8]. However, more recent reports found no difference in conversion rate or complications [9,10]. It was also realized that the benefits of laparoscopic surgery, such as early mobilization and decreased hospital stay, would greatly benefit obese patients [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%