Objective The Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research (SCAR) and SCAR-2 studies demonstrated that the burden of adhesions following lower abdominal surgery is considerable and appears to remain unchanged despite advances in strategies to prevent adhesions. In this study, we assessed the adhesion-related readmission risk directly associated with common lower abdominal surgical procedures, taking into account the effect of previous surgery, demography and concomitant disease.Methods Data from the Scottish National Health Service medical record linkage database were used to assess the risk of an adhesion-related readmission following open lower abdominal surgery during April 1996-March 1997.Results Patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery (excluding appendicectomy) had a 5% risk of readmission directly related to adhesions in the 5 years following surgery. Appendicectomy was associated with a lower rate of readmission (0.9%), but contributed over 7% of the total lower abdominal surgery patient readmission burden. Panproctocolectomy (15.4%), total colectomy (8.8%) and ileostomy surgery (10.6%) were associated with the highest risk of an adhesion-related readmission. Overall, the risk of readmission was doubled in patients who had undergone abdominal or pelvic surgery within 5 years of the incident operation. A higher risk of readmission was also recorded in patients aged < 60 years compared with those aged ‡ 60 yrs. The effect of gender was assessed. However, as the surgical codes used were found to be skewed towards women, these data have not been reported. Readmission risk was slightly higher in patients with concomitant peritonitis compared with patients without peritonitis. In contrast, Crohn's disease had no effect on risk. Patients with colorectal cancer had a lower risk of adhesion formation. However, this may have been due to the type of surgery performed in this patient group. ConclusionThe identification of high-risk patient subgroups may assist in effectively targeting adhesionprevention strategies and the proffering of preoperative advice on adhesion risk.

A total of 100 consecutive patients with perforated duodenal or juxtapyloric ulcers were treated by: laparotomy and omental patch repair (group 1, n = 44); laparoscopic suture patch repair (group 2, n = 35); and laparoscopic fibrin glue repair (group 3, n = 21). The three groups were comparable in Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II score and in other known operative risk factors such as shock on admission, delayed presentation and associated underlying medical illness. Operative mortality and morbidity data were identical in all groups. The mean operating time was 52.1, 101.3 and 61.1 min respectively in the three groups (group 1 versus group 2, group 2 versus group 3, and group 1 versus groups 2 and 3 combined, P < 0.001). The median number of doses of analgesia required after operation was 4, 3 and 1 respectively (group 1 versus groups 2 and 3, P < 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in six patients in group 2 and in one in group 3 (P not significant). The median hospital stay was 5 days in all three groups. Patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer required fewer postoperative doses of analgesia than those who had open repair. Laparoscopic glue repair has the additional advantage over laparoscopic suture of being technically simpler; it also takes less time to perform.

Colorectal surgery is associated with a considerable rate of adhesion-related readmissions. Preventative measures should be considered to reduce this risk.

No abstract