2021
DOI: 10.5540/03.2021.008.01.0454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O Processo de Análise Hierárquica (AHP) e a teoria das Inteligências Múltiplas (MI): uma revisão de literatura com meta-síntese sobre a relação entre o método e a teoria

Abstract: Resumo. Este trabalho traz uma investigação, através de uma revisão sistemática e meta-síntese, acerca de artigos acadêmicos que trabalharam com o Processo de Análise Hierárquica (AHP) em conjunto com a teoria das Inteligências Múltiplas (MI). A busca através das palavras-chave "Analytic Hierarchy Process" e "Multiple Intelligences" retornou 107 trabalhos e, desses, apenas sete realmente trabalhavam com o método AHP e a teoria das MI. A apresentação desses trabalhos foi feita através de uma meta-síntese para e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AHP is a highly useful method for decision-making when evaluating alternatives with multiple factors (Saaty, 1991). However, Quadros et al (2021) argue that AHP may exhibit inconsistencies in judging certain attributes. Nevertheless, Reis et al (2013) highlight the advantage of AHP's simplicity and wide applicability, where intuition is combined with rationality, thus mitigating potential deficiencies of the method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP is a highly useful method for decision-making when evaluating alternatives with multiple factors (Saaty, 1991). However, Quadros et al (2021) argue that AHP may exhibit inconsistencies in judging certain attributes. Nevertheless, Reis et al (2013) highlight the advantage of AHP's simplicity and wide applicability, where intuition is combined with rationality, thus mitigating potential deficiencies of the method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%