O circuito familista na política de assistência social / Familist circuit on Social Assistance Policy

Abstract

Este artigo está licenciado sob forma de uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que a publicação original seja corretamente citada. ABSTRACT -It analyzes the contemporary configuration of social assistance policy to investigate how the state and the families share responsibility provision to basic needs of individuals and to combat deprivation and social risks. Through genealogical method, a documentary analysis of the laws was made, decrees and other regulations of social assistance policy to develop subsidies for discussion. It argues that assistance lifted to the status of social security policy from 1988 through the structuring of a familist circuit complex, whose responsibilities to combat deprivation, vulnerability and social risks of the citizens are shared between the state and families, or are still transferred legally to families or fully assumed by them when there is state failure.

Quality of life of Brazilian families who have children with Williams syndrome

“…These results refer to the theory of familism, a multidimensional construct that encompasses attitudes about the importance of family and behaviors that reflect the way family ties are prioritized, which may be a more salient cultural model among Latinos (Cohen et al, 2014; Hernández and Bámaca-Colbert, 2016). The familism orientation of social policy in Brazil has been criticized because it is seen as some way for public power to retreat from its obligations of providing protection, inclusion, and social integration for people with disabilities (Cronemberger and Teixeira 2012; Santos, 2017). Our results emphasize family advocacy in Brazil as a vital welfare provider for people with WS.…”

Modelo para determinação do grau de globalização da empresa

“…Emprestando a terminologia adotada por Santos (1991), é como se os chamados elementos duros ou frios da modernidade -ciência, tecnologia, empresamento econômico e crítica epistemológica -estivessem em claro descompasso com seus elementos quentes -cidadania universal, dessacralização da cultura, emergência das Ciências Sociais e consciência dos signos -de sorte que o maior desafio do processo corrente provavelmente não se encontre na esfera técno/científica, mas sim no âmbito social e político. É patente, por exemplo, a incapacidade dos legisladores de manter um arcabouço legal compatível com a rápida evolução tecnológica.…”