O brother, where art thou located?: raising awareness of variability in location tracking for users of location-based pervasive applications

Abstract

There is a diversity of ways to determine a user's location in a pervasive environment today. On a large-scale, this diversity often results in variability of location tracking conditions throughout the environment. For an important class of pervasive applications, which often rely on the ubiquitous availability of location tracking -location-based pervasive applications, the consistency of their behaviour under this variability cannot be guaranteed. This type of limitation raises a need for the adaptation of the application's behaviour that would reflect this variability. We investigated empirically how visualising different aspects of uncertainty about location and of the behaviour of localisation systems affects users' impressions about a location-based application. The two components -an ontology that models properties of localisation systems and a set of mapping rules that define how these properties should be visualised in a user interfaceare at the core of our approach to providing awareness. The results of the investigation show that the additional visual demand, intended for raising users' awareness of uncertainty about their location tracking conditions, is perceived to be beneficial by users. We reveal also that different characteristics of this awareness are of different importance to users. Furthermore, we conclude that the particular importance depends on users' personal profiles (e.g., their eyesight level), on the distance between the users (e.g., knowing about someone else's state is less important if they are far), and on the quality of tracking (the importance increases in problematic areas). Based on the obtained results and observations, we suggest a set of guidelines and visualisations which could be used in designing pervasive applications that require location tracking.

Location Information Quality: A Review

“…Application level adaptation : In addition to improving positional information using the approaches outlined above, it is also possible to deal with quality at the application level as a third strategy. For example, in the case of pedestrian navigation systems, it has been shown that conveying uncertainty in location information is beneficial to users [ 104 ]. Therefore, navigation systems usually use a visualization to communicate the quality of location information as a means of dealing with location uncertainty.…”

“…These visualizations could be a ’bar of connectivity’ [ 4 ] to indicate the reception of location information or a ’location status window’ to show the last known location as well as the time in minutes that has elapsed since it was last measured [ 4 ]. The most common visualization method is a circular buffer around the approximate location whose size increases with decreasing quality of location information [ 8 , 104 , 105 ]. Another application level adaptation strategy used by navigation system is to start an interactive dialogue with the user to improve the quality of location information based on their answers [ 106 ].…”