2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritive value of some Zagros Mountain rangeland species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
1
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
20
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Babayemi and Bamikole (2006) and Mebrahtu and Tenaye (1997) both reported that higher in vitro gas production of a feed is an indication of higher digestibility and release of nutrient from feed samples. Metabolisable energy of hay, silage and L. leucocephala leaves in this study was in line with NRC (2001) that reported ME content of 8.6 MJ/kg DM for Pennisetum purpureum while Arzani et al (2006) reported mean ME content of 7.75 MJ/kg DM for grasses. In a study carried out by Ozelcam et al (2015) on Lolium multiflorum (caramba), highest values for in vivo metabolizable energy were found in silage and fresh form (7.83 and 7.72 MJ/kg DM respectively), followed by the hay form (6.77 MJ/kg DM).…”
Section: Post Incubation Parameterssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Babayemi and Bamikole (2006) and Mebrahtu and Tenaye (1997) both reported that higher in vitro gas production of a feed is an indication of higher digestibility and release of nutrient from feed samples. Metabolisable energy of hay, silage and L. leucocephala leaves in this study was in line with NRC (2001) that reported ME content of 8.6 MJ/kg DM for Pennisetum purpureum while Arzani et al (2006) reported mean ME content of 7.75 MJ/kg DM for grasses. In a study carried out by Ozelcam et al (2015) on Lolium multiflorum (caramba), highest values for in vivo metabolizable energy were found in silage and fresh form (7.83 and 7.72 MJ/kg DM respectively), followed by the hay form (6.77 MJ/kg DM).…”
Section: Post Incubation Parameterssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The decreased N contents with sheep grazing could mainly be due to redistribution of N inputs and the standing plant biomass removal and consumption by sheep because other soil forming factors (i.e., soil type, parent materials, topography, and climate) were relatively constant for grazed and ungrazed rangelands. Furthermore, the presence of perennial legume species, such as Coronilla varia L., Lotus corniculatus L., Onobrychis sativa L., can increase soil N contents under ungrazed conditions, since the N 2 -fixing legumes with more forage digestibility (Arzani et al 2006) are consumed by sheep under grazed conditions and therefore are less abundant in grazed than ungrazed areas of Zagros Mountain rangelands (Arzani et al 2006). Similarly, substantial decreases in soil N as a result of heavy livestock grazing were reported in other arid and semi-arid grasslands (He et al 2009;Jeddi and Chaieb 2010;Liu et al 2011;Qi et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TtNAM-B1 (DQ869672) corresponds to NAM-B1 protein sequence for Triticum turgidum; NAM_Domain_A-B-C-D-E correspond to sequences of the NAM subdomain A, B, C, D and E from TtNAM-B1 (DQ869672) sequence; HvNAM-1 (DQ869678) corresponds to protein sequence related to the 11 European varieties of Hordeum vulgare; HsNAM-AZER corresponds to protein sequence from Hordeum spontaneum from Azerbaidjan (EU908210) and HbNAM-ALBA corresponds to protein sequence from Hordeum bulbosum from Albania (EU908211), using the Multalign algorithm. An estimation of GPC for H. bulbosum, based on Arzani et al (2006), was also used to compare to the GPC values measured for cultivated barley of this work. Arzani et al (2006) showed a mean GPC value of 7.80% for H. bulbosum, which was the lowest GPC among 22 different species.…”
Section: Gpc Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimation of GPC for H. bulbosum, based on Arzani et al (2006), was also used to compare to the GPC values measured for cultivated barley of this work. Arzani et al (2006) showed a mean GPC value of 7.80% for H. bulbosum, which was the lowest GPC among 22 different species. Compared to measurements of GPC made in this study for cultivated barley, it is also a lower value.…”
Section: Gpc Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%