Nutritionally Directed Compensatory Growth Enhances Heifer Development and Lactation Potential

Abstract

The objectives of this study were 1) to examine the interactive influence of a compensatory nutrition regimen and lasalocid supplementation on dairy heifer growth performance and 2) to document the extent to which compensatory growth sustains lactation potential over the first two lactation cycles. Twelve Holstein heifers, weighing an average of 160 kg (about 6 mo of age) were randomly assigned to treatments arranged in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Treatment variables were two dietary regimens (control and stair-step compensatory nutrition) and two levels of lasalocid (0 and 200 mg/d). The control heifers were fed a diet containing 12% crude protein (CP) and 2.35 Mcal of metabolizable energy (ME) per kilogram of dry matter. The stair-step compensatory nutrition heifers were subjected to a phased nutrition regimen and reared according to an alternating 3-2-4-3-4-2-mo schedule. The first stair-step (prepubertal phase) consisted of energy restriction [17% CP and 2.35 Mcal/kg of ME] for 3 mo followed by realimentation (12% CP and 3.05 Mcal/kg of ME) for 2 mo. The second step (puberty and breeding) consisted of energy restriction for 4 mo followed by realimentation for 3 mo. The third step (gestation period) was energy restriction for 4 mo concluding with realimentation for 2 mo. Dry matter intake of heifers during the restriction phase was limited to 70% of the control intake. Heifers were given ad libitum access to a high energy density diet during realimentation to allow compensatory development. Stair-step heifers supplemented with lasalocid had the highest efficiency of growth (body weight gain/dry matter intake), suggesting synergistic metabolism of lasalocid with compensatory growth action. Compensatory growth induced during the last trimester enhanced metabolic status by increasing circulating insulin and decreasing triglyceride levels. Heifers on the stair-step regimen had a significant increase in milk yield during the first (21%) and second (15%) lactation cycles. These results support our thesis that compensatory growth induced during an allometric growth phase improves mammary development and energy and protein metabolic status of dairy heifers.

<b>Nutrient intake, productive performance and body measurements of dairy heifers fed with different sources of protein</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v35i3.18749

“…The authors claimed that gains above this level concentrate more quantity of fat tissue in the mammary gland, reducing the milk production at the first lactation and also at the subsequent ones. Nevertheless, it must be considered that in other studies, no negative effect from feeding was observed in the pre-pubertal period and during milk production ( VAN AMBURGH et al, 1998;SEJRSEN et al 2000;FORD;PARK, 2001). In this way, the weight gain obtained in this study (0.875 kg day -1 ) may not cause problems in future lactations of these heifers.…”

Sustainability of ruminant agriculture in the new context: feeding strategies and features of animal adaptability into the necessary holistic approach

“…Digestive and metabolic adaptations in this rebound period are effective within few days (Hoch et al, 2003), showing the reactivity of the organism to benefit from an improvement in its nutritional conditions. Such a strategy can be successfully applied to dairy heifers (Ford and Park, 2001). …”

Heifer fertility and carry over consequences for life time production in dairy and beef cattle

“…This may reduce feed costs by making use of compensatory growth mechanisms during the well-fed periods. For example, Ford and Park (2001) trialled a three-step regime between 6 months and first calving in dairy heifers. This was said to benefit mammary development and milk production in the first and second lactations, but with only four animals per group.…”