1993
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4488(93)90143-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional value of common oak (Quercus calliprinos) browse as fodder for goats: Experimental results in ecological perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Present results are in concurrence with earlier reports, who have reported that CT are beneficial to ruminants at low concentration because they protect plant proteins from degradation in the rumen (Waghorn and Shelton, 1992;Wang et al, 1994;Dey et al, 2008;. Higher CT level (more than 5%) in the diet of ruminants adversely affect the intake and digestibility of forage (Perevolotsky et al, 1993). Rowe et al (1988) reported a reduction in apparent digestibility of OM across the whole digestive tract, but particularly in the abomasum of H. contortus infected sheep.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Present results are in concurrence with earlier reports, who have reported that CT are beneficial to ruminants at low concentration because they protect plant proteins from degradation in the rumen (Waghorn and Shelton, 1992;Wang et al, 1994;Dey et al, 2008;. Higher CT level (more than 5%) in the diet of ruminants adversely affect the intake and digestibility of forage (Perevolotsky et al, 1993). Rowe et al (1988) reported a reduction in apparent digestibility of OM across the whole digestive tract, but particularly in the abomasum of H. contortus infected sheep.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Condensed tannin concentrations greater than 5% adversely affect forage intake and digestibility (Perevolotsky et al, 1993;Silanikove et al, 1996). However, some reports from literature confirmed that ruminant animals are able to handle browse plants with tannin content below 100 g/kg DM (Gasmi-Boubaker et al, 2005) although the tolerance level may vary between animal species (Onwuka, 1992).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Plant Species and Forage Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably the reason for the low intake of these shrubs was not poor nutritional quality (Rogosic et al, 2006b), but because they contained high concentrations of secondary compounds. High concentrations of tannins in Q. calliprinos (Perevolotsky et al, 1993) have been found to reduce preference for that shrub by sheep and goats. Tannins also limit the intake of strawberry trees (A. unedo) and holly oak (Q. ilex), dominant shrubs in Mediterranean maquis vegetation (Rogosic et al, 2006a(Rogosic et al, , 2006b.…”
Section: Plant Secondary Compounds As Browsing Deterrents In Mediterrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutrient composition of these shrubs varies considerably (Rogosic et al, 2006b), ranging from low to intermediate diet quality. However, utilisation of the Mediterranean shrubs is often limited by secondary compounds such as tannins, terpenes and saponins (Perevolotsky et al, 1993;Silanikove et al, 1994;Rogosic et al, 2003Rogosic et al, , 2006aRogosic et al, , 2007Rogosic et al, , 2008. High concentrations of these components can adversely affect forage intake and animal health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%