2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3362184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional Regulation and International Trade in APEC Economies: The New Chilean Food Labeling Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By appealing to preferences for United States and United Kingdom products especially-and suggesting a risk of losing access to these products-the Chilean trade advantage framing persuaded many committee members (who were mostly ambivalent about FOPL otherwise) that it was an unreasonable advantage. Complicating matters, this is both in line with international trade rules of non-discrimination amongst trading partners (Boza et al, 2019), and yet acts against this norm when cultural preferences come into consideration. Importantly, these same committee members were often unaware that FOPL had transferred into standard setting as a public health policy at all.…”
Section: Framing Strategy 1: Privileged Trading Partnersmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By appealing to preferences for United States and United Kingdom products especially-and suggesting a risk of losing access to these products-the Chilean trade advantage framing persuaded many committee members (who were mostly ambivalent about FOPL otherwise) that it was an unreasonable advantage. Complicating matters, this is both in line with international trade rules of non-discrimination amongst trading partners (Boza et al, 2019), and yet acts against this norm when cultural preferences come into consideration. Importantly, these same committee members were often unaware that FOPL had transferred into standard setting as a public health policy at all.…”
Section: Framing Strategy 1: Privileged Trading Partnersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Under the Agreement on TBT, the WTO considers standards set by relevant international standards bodies as "standards," whereas those set by governments, intergovernmental organizations or the UN are considered technical regulations (Boza et al, 2019;Clapp, 1998). Therefore, any variation-in the form of legislation, policy, or rules-from international standards are considered technical regulations (Participant 1, August 23, 2019).…”
Section: Framing Strategy 2: Technical Barriers To Tradementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations