2014
DOI: 10.3354/meps10702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutritional and reproductive strategies in a chemosymbiotic bivalve living in a tropical intertidal seagrass bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high consistency in Loripes intake between birds within years favours the first explanation. Differences in toxic load may relate to the mixotrophic life style of Loripes [ 32 ] and potentially has effects on the spatial distribution and population dynamics of Loripes , by influencing predation risk [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high consistency in Loripes intake between birds within years favours the first explanation. Differences in toxic load may relate to the mixotrophic life style of Loripes [ 32 ] and potentially has effects on the spatial distribution and population dynamics of Loripes , by influencing predation risk [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…orbiculatus is able to supplement its diet with filter feeding on a seasonal basis [7]. Here we show that not only the host, but also the chemoautotrophic symbionts may modulate their metabolic activities according to the availability of external (or recycled) resources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Still, we know little about nutrient cycling in lucinid bivalves at both the organismal and the ecosystem scale. Most studies to date have focused on carbon (C) fixation by the symbionts and transfer to the host [5,6] or on the additional contribution of filter feeding to host nutrition [7]. Nitrogen (N) metabolism has received far less attention until recently, when dinitrogen (N 2 ) fixation by chemosynthetic symbionts was shown to be possible in two lucinid species [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results imply that in our temperate study system, the L. orbiculatus population was close to carrying capacity, and that under current environmental (i.e., sulfide) conditions, the experimentally enhanced L. orbiculatus densities cannot be sustained in the long term. As body condition of L. orbiculatus is known to be positively correlated with reproductive output (Van Der Geest et al, 2014) and likely also with growth and survival (Paine, 1976), the population size of L. orbiculatus is expected to increase when organic inputs and associated pore water sulfide production gradually increase over time. This could eventually lead to a new equilibrium where the higher sulfide productions rates are again buffered by the L. orbiculatus population that has now increased in size, thus resulting in overall low sediment van der Geest et al L. orbiculatus condition expressed as the flesh/shell dry weight (DW) ratio per treatment (n = 6 per treatment) after 50 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the subtidal seagrass beds dominated by Zostera noltei in Thau lagoon (France), which are known to be inhabited by the lucinid bivalve Loripes orbiculatus (synonyms L. lucinalis and L. lacteus) (Rossi et al, 2013). Like all lucinid bivalves investigated so far, L. orbiculatus mainly lives off carbon products provided by sulfide-oxidizing chemoautotrophic bacteria [i.e., Candidatus Thiodiazotropha endoloripes (Petersen et al, 2016)] living inside its gills (Van Der Geest et al, 2014). In this symbiotic association, the bivalve host favors chemosynthesis by its gill-symbionts by facilitating the supply of sulfide, carbon dioxide and oxygen to its gills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%