Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

Mallarino, Antonio P.; Oltmans, Ryan R.; Prater, Jacob R.; Villavicencio, Carlos Xavier; Thompson, Louis M.

doi:10.31274/icm-180809-269

Cited by 12 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Maximum plant N, P, S, and K contents were all primarily governed by the N rate applied. Similar responses were reported previously (Kamprath, 1987;Wang et al, 2007;Setiyono et al, 2010;Mallarino et al, 2011).…”

Section: Dissecting the Internal Efficiencies: Grain Nutrient Concentsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…4E). Similar mean shoot P concentrations (1.2 g kg -1 ) and grain P concentrations (3.0 g kg -1 ) were reported by Mallarino et al (2011) across 11 maize site-years (GY = 10.7 Mg ha -1 ).…”

Section: Dissecting the Internal Efficiencies: Grain Nutrient Concentsupporting

confidence: 74%

“…Similar late-season K declines were documented by Jones and Huston (1914), Sayre (1948), Hanway (1962a), Karlen et al (1988), Djaman (2011), andNing et al (2012). In addition, Mallarino et al (2011) quantified K and P losses from maize vegetative structures between maturity and harvest. Setiyono et al (2010) reported a mean K of 26.9 g m -2 at maturity (range 0.43-59.8 g m -2 ).…”

Section: Nutrient Content Evolution: Phosphorus Potassium and Sulfursupporting

confidence: 70%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Maize Nutrient Accumulation and Partitioning in Response to Plant Density and Nitrogen Rate: I. Macronutrients

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding nutrient balances in changing cropping systems is critical to appropriately adjust agronomic recommendations and inform breeding efforts to increase nutrient efficiencies. Research to determine the season‐long P, K, and S uptake and partitioning dynamics in maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by low, medium, and high plant density (PD) and N rate factors and their interactions was conducted over four site‐years in Indiana. Plant nutrient contents at maturity responded predominantly to N rate. Relative nutrient contents at silking compared with those at maturity were 47% for P, 100% for K, and 58% for S. Concentrations of P, K, and S varied less in leaf vs. stem (vegetative stage) and in ear vs. shoot (reproductive stage). Equivalent stoichiometric ratios were documented for N and S partitioning in leaf, stem, and ear components. The PD and N rate treatments did not modify P, K, and S nutrient partitioning to plant components during vegetative or reproductive periods (except for an N rate effect on leaf vs. stem P partitioning). Near silking, relative nutrient partitioning to the ear followed the order P > S > K. This mimicked the nutrient harvest indices observed at maturity, suggesting genetic modulation. Ratios of N to P, K, and S in whole‐plant tissues were influenced by N content changes in response to N rate but not by PD. As the season progressed, PD and N rates changed the absolute P, K, and S quantities (primarily reflecting biomass responses) but had little influence on nutrient ratios.

show abstract

Section: Dissecting the Internal Efficiencies: Grain Nutrient Concentsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…4E). Similar mean shoot P concentrations (1.2 g kg -1 ) and grain P concentrations (3.0 g kg -1 ) were reported by Mallarino et al (2011) across 11 maize site-years (GY = 10.7 Mg ha -1 ).…”

Section: Dissecting the Internal Efficiencies: Grain Nutrient Concentsupporting

confidence: 74%

Section: Nutrient Content Evolution: Phosphorus Potassium and Sulfursupporting

confidence: 70%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Maize Nutrient Accumulation and Partitioning in Response to Plant Density and Nitrogen Rate: I. Macronutrients

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The collective annual removal of micronutrients in the soil by crops could range between 0.01 and 4.9 kg ha −1 , dependent on the micronutrients and crop (Rietra et al 2015). For example, Mallarino et al (2011) demonstrated in an Iowan soil that for a grain yield of about 4.8 t ha of these nutrients present in DTPA-extractible form, dependent on soil (McKenzie 2001;Samourgiannidis and Matsi 2013;Sobral et al 2013), a normal healthy plant would not be able to meet the supply of all of its micronutrient requirements from the soil. Using these values, by a rough estimate, a crop would be deficit of micronutrients by 11 % (difference between the amount present for uptake [upper limit; 90 mg kg…”

Section: Role Of Micronutrients In Crop Nutritional Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Fortification of micronutrients for efficient agronomic production: a review

Dimkpa

Bindraban

2016

Agron. Sustain. Dev.

264

163

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Micronutrients are essential mineral elements required for both plant and human development. However, micronutrients are often lacking in soils, crop, and food. Micronutrients are therefore used as fertilizer to increase crop productivity, especially when the application of conventional NPK fertilizers is not efficient. Here, we review the application of micronutrients in crop production. Reports show that micronutrients enhance crop nutritional quality, crop yield, biomass production, and resiliency to drought, pest, and diseases. These positive effects range from 10 to 70 %, dependent on the micronutrient, and occur with or without NPK fertilization. We discuss the uptake by plants of micronutrients as nanosize particulate materials, relative to conventional uptake of ionic nutrients. We also show that packaging of micronutrients as nanoparticles could have more profound effects on crop responses and fertilizer use efficiency, compared to conventional salts or bulk oxides.

show abstract

“…Nutrient stoichiometry is useful to understand crop nutrient status, and nutrient ratios can be useful to comprehend nutrient supplies (Mo et al, 2015). Some recent studies have focused on nutrient stoichiometry in soybean (Mallarino et al, 2011;Salvagiotti et al, 2012;Divito and Sadras, 2014;Divito et al, 2016;. For example, S/N ratio is a better indicator of soybean S status than S concentration alone (Divito et al, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Shifts in Soybean Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Nutrient Stoichiometry: A Historical Synthesis‐Analysis

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Few studies have investigated changes over time in nutrient uptake and yield, in addition to the study of nutrient stoichiometry as a metric of nutrient limitations in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. A comprehensive synthesis‐analysis was performed by compiling a global historical soybean database of yield, total biomass, and nutrient (N, P, and K) content and concentration in studies published from 1922 to 2015. This period was divided in three eras based on genetically modified soybean events: Era I (1922–1996), Era II (1997–2006), and Era III (2007–2015). The main findings of this review are: (i) seed yield improved from 1.3 Mg ha−1 in the 1930s to 3.2 Mg ha−1 in the 2010s; (ii) yield increase was primarily driven by increase in biomass rather than harvest index (HI); (iii) both N and P HIs increased over time; (iv) seed nutrient concentration remained stable for N and declined for both P (18%) and K (13%); (v) stover nutrient concentration remained stable for N, diminished for P, and increased for K; (vi) nutrient ratios portray different trends for N/P (Era I and III > II), N/K (Era I > II and III), and K/P (Era II and III > I); (vii) yield per unit of nutrient uptake (internal efficiency) increased for N (33%) and P (44%) and decreased for K (11%); and (viii) variations in nutrient internal efficiency were primarily explained by increase in nutrient HI for N and K, but equally explained by both HI for P and seed P concentration. These findings have implications for soybean production and integrated nutrient management to improve yield, nutrient use efficiency, and seed nutrient composition.

show abstract

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Maize Nutrient Accumulation and Partitioning in Response to Plant Density and Nitrogen Rate: I. Macronutrients

Maize Nutrient Accumulation and Partitioning in Response to Plant Density and Nitrogen Rate: I. Macronutrients

Fortification of micronutrients for efficient agronomic production: a review

Shifts in Soybean Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Nutrient Stoichiometry: A Historical Synthesis‐Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About