2008
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient limitation of picophytoplankton photosynthesis and growth in the tropical North Atlantic

Abstract: Identification of the proximal nutrient limiting primary production is a necessary first step toward evaluating the physiological state of phytoplankton communities and the biogeochemical constraints on the current oceanic carbon cycle. We conducted 48-h nutrient addition bioassay experiments to evaluate nitrogen, phosphorus, and iron limitation of primary productivity, net chlorophyll synthesis, and net increase in cell numbers of the dominant picophytoplankton from the tropical North Atlantic. Our results in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
73
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
18
73
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The data suggest that Prochlorococcus and diazotrophs were limited by the same nutrients and that the net growth of Prochlorococcus was not primarily N limited, inspite the fact that overall N limitation was seen at the total phytoplankton biomass level. The results appear to differ from those from the North Atlantic (Bell et al, 2002;Moore et al, 2008), but the types of nutrient response measures used (pigment content vs cell abundance) may not be comparable, as per cell Chl a content potentially increases relatively more than cell abundance in response to N (Davey et al, 2008).…”
Section: Responses In Prochlorococcuscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data suggest that Prochlorococcus and diazotrophs were limited by the same nutrients and that the net growth of Prochlorococcus was not primarily N limited, inspite the fact that overall N limitation was seen at the total phytoplankton biomass level. The results appear to differ from those from the North Atlantic (Bell et al, 2002;Moore et al, 2008), but the types of nutrient response measures used (pigment content vs cell abundance) may not be comparable, as per cell Chl a content potentially increases relatively more than cell abundance in response to N (Davey et al, 2008).…”
Section: Responses In Prochlorococcuscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…While some uncultivated Prochlorococcus are thought to acquire nitrate (Martiny et al, 2009), none of the cultivated strains have this capability. In the Sargasso Sea, Prochlorococcus pigment content responded positively to NH 4 NO 3 additions, although nitrate alone or iron had no effect (Davey et al, 2008;Moore et al, 2008). In contrast, in our experiments, the HL Prochlorococcus abundances remained stable or were reduced under N (nitrate þ ammonium) additions, and responded positively to iron and organic carbon additions.…”
Section: Responses In Prochlorococcuscontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nearly all phosphate acquisition and metabolism genes were differentially expressed in C. watsonii during the diel cycle ( Figures 5b and c); the exception was phoH gene encoding phosphate starvation inducible protein (Supplementary Table S2). DNA replication may cause the increased demand for inorganic phosphate in a cell (Klausmeier et al, 2004;Davey et al, 2008) explaining maximum transcript abundance for phosphate acquisition and phosphatase genes during late light-early dark period (Figure 5b), similar to the expression of pstCAB and phoA genes in Prochlorococcus (Zinser et al, 2009). In contrast, only one phosphate transport gene, pstS, was cycling in Cyanothece, although it had similar to C. watsonii maximum expression at L11 .…”
Section: Crocosphaera Diel Gene Expression T Shi Et Almentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Studies on E. huxleyi under nutrient limited conditions and elevated pCO 2 are rare (Sciandra et al, 2003;Leonardos and Geider, 2005;Borchard et al, 2011), whereas light, macroand micronutrient supply in the upper ocean are the main factors limiting phytoplankton growth (Davey et al, 2008;Moore et al, 2008;Marinov et al, 2010). Emiliania huxleyi is a poor competitor for nitrate compared to diatoms (Riegmann et al, 1992) but has an extraordinarily high affinity for orthophosphate and is able to utilise organic phosphates (Riegmann et al, 2000), displaying a high competitive ability in phosphate limited areas of the ocean.…”
Section: N Müller Et Al: Influence Of Co 2 and Nitrogen Limitatimentioning
confidence: 99%