2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(00)00041-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient absorption and utilization by wing and flight muscle morphs of the cricket Gryllus firmus: implications for the trade-off between flight capability and early reproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with findings from a prior series of simple diet dilution experiments (Zera and Brink, 2000;Zera and Larsen, 2001), we found that LW(f) females preferentially retained flight muscle and somatic lipid stores at the expense of ovary development and overall mass gain, across the entire nutritional landscape. That is, the flight-fecundity trade-off is highly canalized.…”
Section: P<0001supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consistent with findings from a prior series of simple diet dilution experiments (Zera and Brink, 2000;Zera and Larsen, 2001), we found that LW(f) females preferentially retained flight muscle and somatic lipid stores at the expense of ovary development and overall mass gain, across the entire nutritional landscape. That is, the flight-fecundity trade-off is highly canalized.…”
Section: P<0001supporting
confidence: 89%
“…On the standard diet, used in this study, LW(f) and SW lines differ to only a small degree (!10%) in total food consumption or assimilation of total nutrients, protein, lipid, or carbohydrate from ingested food (Zera and Brink 2000;A. J. Zera, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Reduced nutrient availability can substantially magnify, while increased nutrient availability can diminish or obviate an apparent trade-off ( Figure 1) (Kaitala 1987, Chippindale et al 1993, Simmons & Bradley 1997, Nijhout & Emlen 1998, Zera et al 1998, Zera & Brink 2000; see clutch size studies in "Birds" section). These plastic responses of a trade-off are determined by priority rules, which govern relative allocation to organismal processes as a function of nutrient input.…”
Section: Trade-off Plasticity and Priority Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%