2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NuScale small modular reactor for Co-generation of electricity and water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The design has several features that differentiate it from other existing containment systems. First, the rated pressure is 5.5 MPa (800 psia), which is 12 times higher than old-style containments [1]. As a result, the design is claimed can withstand all LOCAs that may occur inside containment.…”
Section: Description Of the "Nuscale" Reactormentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The design has several features that differentiate it from other existing containment systems. First, the rated pressure is 5.5 MPa (800 psia), which is 12 times higher than old-style containments [1]. As a result, the design is claimed can withstand all LOCAs that may occur inside containment.…”
Section: Description Of the "Nuscale" Reactormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The module comprises of 160 MWt reactor core and other primary system components that are housed in single reactor pressure vessel and enclosed by a relatively small steel containment vessel, which is submerged in a large pool of water. Several power modules (as many as 12 modules) can be co-placed in the same pool [1].…”
Section: Description Of the "Nuscale" Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Licensing small modular light water reactors with new features, such as passive cooling, is challenging and in most countries associated with increased costs for the licensing procedure and uncertainties regarding the outcome of the licensing process [119,120]. NuScale's present attempts to license their small modular reactor design in the U.S. may be a good example of this [121,122]. Licensing small modular reactors that are not only different in power level but show fundamental differences to currently deployed light water reactors such as a different coolant or moderator creates additional uncertainties for the licensor and thus increase the risk of the applicant to provide additional information, that results in increased costs for the overall licensing procedure [123][124][125][126][127][128].…”
Section: Identified Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary coolant is injected to the secondary side of the OTSGs or OTHXs and is changed to be the satisfactory working fluid for driving different thermal loads such as a steam turbine. Actually, OTHSS are very common in practical engineering such as the integral pressurized water reactors (iPWR, e.g., Nuscale, IRIS and mPower) with internal OTSGs [3][4][5][6], modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR, e.g., HTR-Module [7][8][9], MHTGR [10] and HTR-PM [11][12][13]) with side-by-side arranged OTSGs, concentrating solar power (CSP) plants with OTSGs [14] or OTHXs [15] and even coal-fired once-through boilers. A thermally interconnected distributed energy system is called a hybrid energy system (HES) [16][17][18] if the heat sources of OTHSS modules are of different types, otherwise it is called a multimodular energy system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%