Nurses’ perceptions and practice of physical restraint in China

Jiang, Hui; Li, Chen; Gu, Ying; He, Yide

doi:10.1177/0969733014557118

Cited by 39 publications

(92 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding indicates that nurses consider ensuring patient safety their most important task and that most nurses believe physical restraint is a necessary means of preventing the accidental removal of a tube or disruptive behaviours, especially if there are too few nurses to supervise the patients. Jiang's study (Jiang et al 2014) yielded similar results. However, there is no evidence that physical restraint use reduces the rate of unplanned extubation, compared with the non-use group (Ge et al 2013;Kontio et al 2009).…”

Section: Knowledge Attitudes and Practices Regarding Physical Restrasupporting

confidence: 54%

“…Jiang's study (Jiang et al. ) yielded similar results. However, there is no evidence that physical restraint use reduces the rate of unplanned extubation, compared with the non‐use group (Ge et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 53%

“…Physical restraint is commonly used to protect patients' safety (Jiang et al. ). A study in 2008 revealed that the prevalence of physical restraint use in ICUs in China is 39.1% (Zhu et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To our knowledge, there is no relevant nursing guideline for physical restraint use has been published in mainland China; consequently, there is a lack of practice criteria for nurses and standard practices for physical restraint use among hospitals (Xu & Zheng 2010). Physical restraint is commonly used to protect patients' safety (Jiang et al 2014). A study in 2008 revealed that the prevalence of physical restraint use in ICUs in China is 39.1% (Zhu et al 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to physical restraint: a cross‐sectional study

Wang

Zhu

Zeng

et al. 2018

International Nursing Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Knowledge Attitudes and Practices Regarding Physical Restrasupporting

confidence: 54%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 53%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to physical restraint: a cross‐sectional study

Wang

Zhu

Zeng

et al. 2018

International Nursing Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Preventing falling from bed could manage confusion, agitation, or impaired psychology, while the lowest reported was prevent falling from chair. They didn't think that nurses needed to stop using of physical restraints [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Perception and Knowledge of Staff Nurses regarding Physical Restrains

Fashafsheh¹,

Mohamed²,

Ayed³

et al. 2019

OJN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions and knowledge regarding physical restraint used among registered nurses (RNs) and nursing assistants (NAs). Method and Sample: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used. A convenient sample was recruited from nursing staff from Palestinian and Saudi Hospitals. Perceptions of Restraint Use Questionnaire (PRUQ) were used [1]. Results: A total of 144 nursing staffs were included. Physical restraint use was perceived as more important in some circumstances than others. In the critical care unit/ICU, the most important perceived reason for physical restraint use was protecting from falling out of bed and preventing removing dressing. There were significant differences of overall score for the PRUQ among all nursing staff according to hospital, t (142) = 8.74, P = 0.001. The mean of Saudi Arabia hospitals group (M = 4.56) was higher than the mean of Palestinian hospital group (M = 3.67). At the same time, there were significant differences of overall score for the PRUQ among all nursing staff according to specialized education in geriatrics, t (40) = 3.60, P = 0.001. The mean of no specialized education in geriatrics group (M = 4.13) was higher than the mean of yes specialized education in geriatrics group (M = 3.69). Conclusion and Implications: Nursing staff showed positive attitudes towards restrains application with difference between Palestinian and Saudi Arabian nurses. Proper implementation and good awareness of the complications are prerequisite for application of physical restrains for patients.

show abstract

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J‐SSCG 2020)

Egi

Ogura

Yatabe

et al. 2021

Acute Medicine & Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J‐SSCG 2020), a Japanese‐specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J‐SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English‐language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese‐language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high‐quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J‐SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU‐acquired weakness [ICU‐AW], post‐intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J‐SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient‐ and family‐centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro‐intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large‐scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE‐based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J‐SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

show abstract

Nurses’ perceptions and practice of physical restraint in China

Abstract: Nursing managers should be aware of the role nurses play in the use of physical restraint. In-service training regarding the proper use of physical restraint should be strengthened and nurse staffing levels should be improved in order to minimize the use of physical restraint in China.

Cited by 39 publications

References 21 publications

Nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to physical restraint: a cross‐sectional study

Nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to physical restraint: a cross‐sectional study

A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Perception and Knowledge of Staff Nurses regarding Physical Restrains

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J‐SSCG 2020)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About