“…The indefinite geographical range of the wild population, the misinterpretations of molecular‐based phylogenies by different mitochondrial genes or nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes, and the incomplete lineage sorting and introgression are the main reasons for the ambiguity of taxonomy and systematics of Cuora species. In this study, we used nuclear ( Rag1 ) and mitochondrial markers (genome and COI ) in conjunction with morphologic characters to construct the phylogeny among the C. galbinifrons complex ( galbinifrons , bourreti , and picturata ), as these geometric morphometrics and molecular markers have been extensively utilized to investigate the origin and evolutionary history of vertebrates, including the whale shark ( Rhincodon typus ; Md Tauqeer, Petit, Read, & Dove, ), Chinese three‐striped box turtle ( Cuora trifasciata ; Li, Zhang, Zhao, Shi, & Zhu, ), Carassius species complex (Liu, Li, et al, ), Conorhynchos (Sullivan, Lundberg, & Hardman, ), Hemiculter leucisculus (Cheng et al, ), and Magadi tilapia (Kavembe, Kautt, Machado‐Schiaffino, & Meyer, ). We detected morphological differences among the C. galbinifrons complex, and moreover, based on the results of nuclear and mitochondrial markers, we investigated whether the galbinifrons , bourreti , and picturata groups can be regarded as separate species or subspecies.…”