2010
DOI: 10.1037/a0018755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerosity impairment in corticobasal syndrome.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE-We assessed the representation of numerosity in corticobasal syndrome (CBS), a neurodegenerative condition affecting the parietal lobe.METHOD-Patients judged whether a target numerosity (e.g., "3") falls between two bounding numerosities (e.g., "1" and "5"). We manipulated the format for representing numerosity (Arabic numerals or dot arrays), the size of the gap between the two bounding numerosities, the absolute magnitude of the numerosities, and the order for presenting the bounding numerosities. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this model, past research has established the involvement of IPS with abstract quantity processing in healthy control populations (Dehaene et al, 2003; Piazza et al, 2007; Wei et al, 2014) and in patients with parietal lesions (Cipolotti et al, 1991; Takayama et al, 1994; Martory et al, 2003; Koss et al, 2010). It followed that IPS would display “supramodal interpretation of numbers”(Eger et al, 2003), and it was indeed shown that this region was activated independent of input notation of the numbers (Naccache and Dehaene, 2001; Pinel et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In line with this model, past research has established the involvement of IPS with abstract quantity processing in healthy control populations (Dehaene et al, 2003; Piazza et al, 2007; Wei et al, 2014) and in patients with parietal lesions (Cipolotti et al, 1991; Takayama et al, 1994; Martory et al, 2003; Koss et al, 2010). It followed that IPS would display “supramodal interpretation of numbers”(Eger et al, 2003), and it was indeed shown that this region was activated independent of input notation of the numbers (Naccache and Dehaene, 2001; Pinel et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Majority quantifiers also rely on number knowledge as a prerequisite to the mental calculation needed to test the validity of an assertion that depends on a mental comparison or manipulation requiring working memory resources (McMillan, et al, 2005; McMillan, et al, 2006). Regardless of the distribution of quantifier subsets, we have argued that difficulty with quantifiers in CBS and bvFTD is related in part to their deficit for number knowledge and associated quantity knowledge (Koss, et al, 2010; Spotorno, et al, 2014). This is somewhat consistent with a broad interpretation of the grounded cognition approach to semantic memory (Barsalou, 2009) by which the representation of conceptual knowledge depends in part on processing associated sensory-motor features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In CBS and bvFTD, difficulty with quantifier comprehension has also been associated with this frontal-parietal network (McMillan, et al, 2006; Morgan, et al, 2011). This same network is associated with processing quantity and number knowledge in healthy adults (Pinel, Dehaene, Riviere, & Le Bihan, 2001; Simon, et al, 2002) and in patients with neurodegenerative disease (Koss, et al, 2010; Morgan, et al, 2011; Spotorno, et al, 2014). We view this as an integrated bilateral network that is biased towards linguistic representations in the left hemisphere and magnitude vectors for quantity in the right hemisphere (Chochon, Cohen, van de Moortele, & Dehaene, 1999; Kadosh, et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon is also consistent with the adult neuropsychological literature. In adults, acalculia occurs primarily after left parietal damage (Dehaene & Cohen, 1995) but is also frequently observed in diseases characterized by bilateral hemispheric impairment, such as progressive cortical atrophy (Delazer, Karner, Zamarian, Donnemiller, & Benke, 2006) and corticobasal-ganglionic degeneration (Koss et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%