2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of progressive collapse resistance of RC beam-slab substructures under perimeter column removal scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These limitations tend to accentuate the contribution of slab towards progressive collapse capacity, as the shell elements are not capable of exhibiting true non-linear behavior. Yu et al (2018) demonstrated through experimental studies that for small deflections (< ¾ beam depth), contribution of slab to progressive collapse capacity was around 10% and increased to a maximum of 30% for larger deflections. Similarly, Botez et al (2016) found contribution from the slab membrane action to be maximum of 15% to the overall flexural capacity.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These limitations tend to accentuate the contribution of slab towards progressive collapse capacity, as the shell elements are not capable of exhibiting true non-linear behavior. Yu et al (2018) demonstrated through experimental studies that for small deflections (< ¾ beam depth), contribution of slab to progressive collapse capacity was around 10% and increased to a maximum of 30% for larger deflections. Similarly, Botez et al (2016) found contribution from the slab membrane action to be maximum of 15% to the overall flexural capacity.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…axial stiffness at the beam boundaries, amount of integrity reinforcement at bar cut-off locations, etc) on progressive collapse resistance of frames. High fidelity solid-element-based numerical models were used by Yu et al [10] to investigate the robustness of RC beam-slab substructures under perimeter column removal scenarios. Shan et al [11] tested two one-third scale, four-bay by two-story RC frame to investigate the effects of infilled wall on the load resisting mechanisms of RC frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternate load path method is one of threat-independent approaches to the check the ability of the remaining structures to bridge over a removed column or wall. Consequently, a series of experimental and numerical studies have been carried out to evaluate the load-redistribution capability of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column assemblies or frames (Deng et al, 2020; Feng et al, 2016; Kang and Tan, 2015; Qian et al, 2020; Yi et al, 2008; Yu and Tan, 2013a, 2013b, 2017) and beam-slab systems (Lim et al, 2017; Lu et al, 2017; Qian et al, 2015, 2016; Yu et al, 2018, 2020) under column removal scenarios (CRS). The priority of research given to the frames and beam-slab systems is because the former is regarded as the primary structural members to redistribute the gravity loads and the large deformation of the latter is regarded as the last line of defense against progressive collapse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%