Numerical Simulations of the University of Michigan Shock Boundary-Layer Interaction Experiments

Modeling Particle Drag in Accelerating Flows with Implications for SBLI in PIV - A Numerical Analysis

“…The data presented from here on has been converted using Eq. 41, 42, 43 to be in accordance with Friedlander's [38] data.…”

“…This error analysis was done to be in compliance with the AIAA SBLI workshop [11]. The results obtained from the particle lag model were presented alongside the data obtained by Friedlander et al [38] to show the importance of particle lag in PIV.…”

“…Finally, in 2013, Friedlander et al [38] tried to close the gap between experimental and computational results by improving the grid and using better solution techniques. The grid was made independent with the use of 56 million nodes and y+ was reduced to a maximum of 0.25 at the wall.…”

“…This figure also highlights the experimental plane that was used in the PIV. The plane presented in the 2D window consists of the experimental plane, which varies from 18.2mm to 61.9mm in the horizontal direction and 0.257mm to 17.7mm in the vertical direction as shown in Friedlander [38]. All the further analysis has been done in experimental coordinate system.…”

“…Although many of the works mentioned above complement each other, there are still some inherent differences between PIV and CFD that are not considered in many of the works until now. One of these differences includes particle lag effects which were briefly reviewed in Friedlander et al [38]. In that work, the author has an improved CFD model which was post-processed using a rudimentary linear model for particle lag.…”