2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/8794022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulations of Chemical-Assisted Steam Flooding in Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoirs after Water Flooding

Abstract: Chemical-assisted steam flooding (CASF) is a promising method for heavy oils. However, few researches have investigated the CASF performance on offshore heavy oil reservoirs recovery after water flooding. In this study, a numerical simulation model was developed to simulate CASF processes for offshore heavy oil reservoirs after water flooding. Then, a comparison of CASF and various thermal methods was made to assess the feasibility of CASF in an offshore heavy reservoir of Bohai Bay, China. Finally, sensitivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows the comparison results of the recovery factor of single sand body reservoir (LD 21-2) under different development modes; it can be seen that the recovery factor of switching to superheated steam flooding after superheated steam huff and puff for 8 cycles was the highest, followed by superheated steam flooding after 4 cycles, and the recovery factor of huff and puff for 16 cycles was the lowest. This is because a large amount of remaining oil between injection and production wells can be driven out after switching to steam flooding, which is difficult to achieve by huff and puff [23,24]. Therefore, for a single sand reservoir, it is recommended to adopt the whole process development mode of switching to superheated steam flooding after eight cycles of superheated steam huff and puff.…”
Section: Single Sand Body Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the comparison results of the recovery factor of single sand body reservoir (LD 21-2) under different development modes; it can be seen that the recovery factor of switching to superheated steam flooding after superheated steam huff and puff for 8 cycles was the highest, followed by superheated steam flooding after 4 cycles, and the recovery factor of huff and puff for 16 cycles was the lowest. This is because a large amount of remaining oil between injection and production wells can be driven out after switching to steam flooding, which is difficult to achieve by huff and puff [23,24]. Therefore, for a single sand reservoir, it is recommended to adopt the whole process development mode of switching to superheated steam flooding after eight cycles of superheated steam huff and puff.…”
Section: Single Sand Body Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%