2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of the Lamb wave propagation in honeycomb sandwich panels: A parametric study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical model of a honeycomb sandwich plate for studying Lamb wave propagation in heterogeneous media. A clear difference between the traveling waves in the top and bottom cover plates is visible, which is due to the energy transmission through the core of the plate .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical model of a honeycomb sandwich plate for studying Lamb wave propagation in heterogeneous media. A clear difference between the traveling waves in the top and bottom cover plates is visible, which is due to the energy transmission through the core of the plate .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considered waveguide is a rectangular and symmetric sandwich plate, composed of an 8‐mm‐thick homogenized honeycomb core surrounded by 1‐mm‐thick fibre‐reinforced skins (see Hosseini and Gabbert[] for example of more complex geometrical models). The 400‐mm‐width cross section is modelled on ANSYS V12.1, and convergence is ensured within the considered frequency range by using 360 linear brick elements having 8 nodes and 3 DOFs per node.…”
Section: Guided Csw In the Sandwich Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9,[22][23][24] The simulations were carried out on (172 mm  114 mm  21 mm) honeycomb sample that consisted of two 2.5 mm thickness CFRP skins and a hexagonal aluminium core having thickness of 16 mm. The FE model of the honeycomb sandwich was composed of 3D solid elements (SOLID64) for the two skins of CRFP plate and 2D solid shell elements (SHELL63) for the aluminium honeycomb core.…”
Section: Simulation Of Guided Waves Propagating Along a Honeycomb Sanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] There have been many studies carried out related to UGW methods showing their advantages over other NDT techniques. [13][14][15][16][17] However, in the case when the internal structure of the multilayered material is not uniform nor known, the excitation and interpretation of the UGW signals received become very complicated and very sensitive to the adjustment of operating parameters of the experimental set-up (type of the excited modes of UGW, operation frequency etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%