Numerical Simulation of Sprinkler Suppression of Rack Storage Fires

Abstract

Fire suppression tests with ceiling sprinkler protection in a rack storage fuel configuration are simulated using a Computational Fluid Dynamics tool. The fuel is arranged in a double-row, six pallet-load wide and three-tier high (2×6×3) rack storage array. Each pallet load consists of three nested double-wall corrugated cardboard boxes surrounding a metal liner. Two types of ceiling sprinklers are used in this study: a pendent quick response sprinkler designated as K14, and an upright standard response sprinkler designated as K11.2. The tests are simulated using FireFOAM, which couples necessary sub-models for fire growth, sprinkler response, and fire suppression. Numerical results are compared with experiments for both free burn tests under a 20-MW calorimeter and sprinkler suppression tests under a 7.6 m high ceiling. For the free burn case, the model results show good quantitative agreement of heat release rates in all three phases, from ignition to fire growth and steady burning. For the suppression cases, the model reproduces the suppression effectiveness of the two sprinkler protection designs: K14 sprinklers suppress the fire rapidly with only one sprinkler activation, while with K11.2 sprinklers, both in the tests and simulation, the fire spreads to the pallets on the end of the fuel array with multiple sprinkler activations. The modeled sprinkler activation times are within the estimated experimental uncertainty following three repeat tests. Quantitative results characterizing sprinkler suppression performance obtained from the simulations, such as the actual delivered density (ADD) and water evaporation rate, are also reported.

Study of the importance of non-uniform mass density in numerical simulations of fire spread over MDF panels in a corner configuration

“…This is known as the 'blowing effect' [38]. In the present study, we bypass the need for a very fine mesh near the walls by accounting for the blowing effect using an empirical wall function developed by Wang et al [39]. Accordingly, when the panels are cooling down (i.e.,…”

Large eddy simulation of flame extinction in a turbulent line fire exposed to air-nitrogen co-flow

“…FireFOAM [11,13,14] is based on OpenFOAM [15], an open-source generalpurpose CFD software package. FireFOAM is an object-oriented, C++ based, second-order accurate, finite volume solver with implicit time integration; PISO and SIMPLE types of solution procedures are used to couple sequentially-solved equations; the solver features advanced meshing capabilities (the mesh geometry is a structured or unstructured polyhedral mesh); it also features a massively parallel computing capability using Message Passing Interface (MPI) protocols.…”

Radiative emissions measurements from a buoyant, turbulent line flame under oxidizer-dilution quenching conditions

“…Such studies have explored the weakening and extinction response of flames to suppression mechanisms, while also comparing the prevalence and relative efficacy of their effects [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Recent works have investigated large-scale fires in realistic configurations, primarily to evaluate suppression performance in specific scenarios, while also delivering much needed data for the validation of suppression models [15][16][17]. Others have focused on developing scaling relationships to compare results from different sized configurations [18,19].…”