2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(01)00204-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of multiphase flow in bubble column reactors. Influence of bubble coalescence and break-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
121
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, those influences are mainly imposed via bubble size, which can be considered as mono-dispersed (work performed at IFPEN) bi-dispersed (work performed at the University of Amsterdam) or poly-dispersed . However, to develop and implement coalescence and breakup complex models, such as those described by Olmos et al (2001) and Sanyal et al (2005), further information is required. Indeed, such models use closure laws, or kernels, based on theoretical approaches, as given by Luo H. and Svendsen (1996), for example, or on experiments, which are rather scarce for high void fraction bubbly turbulent flows.…”
Section: Case Of Bubble Columns For Fischer-tropsch Process Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, those influences are mainly imposed via bubble size, which can be considered as mono-dispersed (work performed at IFPEN) bi-dispersed (work performed at the University of Amsterdam) or poly-dispersed . However, to develop and implement coalescence and breakup complex models, such as those described by Olmos et al (2001) and Sanyal et al (2005), further information is required. Indeed, such models use closure laws, or kernels, based on theoretical approaches, as given by Luo H. and Svendsen (1996), for example, or on experiments, which are rather scarce for high void fraction bubbly turbulent flows.…”
Section: Case Of Bubble Columns For Fischer-tropsch Process Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good deal of research has been done in this subject in the past 20 years, with 2 numerical methods as possible solutions to address the argon injection phenomena; namely Euler-Euler approach and Euler-Lagrangian approach. [32][33][34][35][36][37] The Euler-Euler approach implies the tracking of two different sets of equations, one for the continuum phase (steel in this case) and one for the dispersed phase (argon). The phases are solved as non-interpenetrating, immiscible media with their own material properties (density, viscosity, thermal conductivity, etc.…”
Section: Modelling Argon Injection Through the Dpm+vof Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, two more studies are examined: the first example has been taken from the study by [24] for high dissipation rate values, and the latter one has been taken from the study of Olmos and his colleagues [37] for low values of dissipation rate.…”
Section: Validation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental and numerical results from the study by [37] and the results of our numerical calculations are compared. The comparisons show that our calculations overestimate the Figure 8: Comparison between experimental and calculated results by [37] and this study.…”
Section: Validation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%