10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-2979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Prediction of Chevron Nozzle Noise Reduction Using Wind-MGBK Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar deviations are also found in round jet case SMC000. Such discrepancy seems to be common in jet simulations by RANS [19,20] because the RANS model cannot simulate the vortex stretching term well [21]. Nevertheless, the present results match well with RANS solutions of Engel et al [15].…”
Section: Description Of the Baseflowsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar deviations are also found in round jet case SMC000. Such discrepancy seems to be common in jet simulations by RANS [19,20] because the RANS model cannot simulate the vortex stretching term well [21]. Nevertheless, the present results match well with RANS solutions of Engel et al [15].…”
Section: Description Of the Baseflowsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Engblom et. al [2] investigated a series of cold and hot single flow subsonic nozzle flows including a baseline round nozzle and several chevron nozzles, and a similar trend in the computations indicated much slower mixing towards the nozzle centerline than observed in experiments. Georgiadis et.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, far downstream of the end of the jet potential core, it has been generally found that computed farfield mixing rate becomes too high. As a result, currently available RANS turbulence models are not adequate for accurate prediction of jet flow details.The impetus for the current investigation comes from detailed comparisons of the mean velocity and k fields predicted by the Wind code against Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) data [2] that suggest that the RANS deficiency is most evident in the vicinity of the end of the potential core. More specifically, RANS predicts the shear layer to remain well-defined even as it reaches the centerline at a shallow angle, leaving a relatively thin "sliver" of core flow; whereas experimental results indicate that the shear layer is strongly diffused at the end of the potential core.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, this was accomplished using lobed mixer nozzles. More recently, the addition of chevrons [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] has been examined and found to reduce noise by up to 2.5 EPNdB during installed testing. However, while nozzles with chevrons can significantly reduce low frequency noise, they do so at the expense of increasing high frequency noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%