2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of steam condensing flow in low and high-pressure nozzles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented in [9], in order to reduce the number of equations down to 5 the following assumptions are made: i) the phases are in mechanical equilibrium, ii) the vapor velocity is equal to the liquid one and iii) the droplets temperature is determined through a simplified capillarity model. These assumptions are largely employed in literature [5,6] and proved to be adequate for low pressure steam test cases.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As presented in [9], in order to reduce the number of equations down to 5 the following assumptions are made: i) the phases are in mechanical equilibrium, ii) the vapor velocity is equal to the liquid one and iii) the droplets temperature is determined through a simplified capillarity model. These assumptions are largely employed in literature [5,6] and proved to be adequate for low pressure steam test cases.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple models and numerical schemes potentially applicable to metastable condensation are described in detail in literature [4]. However, the great majority of them have been validated with steam-water experiments at low pressure [4,5,6]. It should be noted that the so called "high-pressure" validation is traditionally made with the experimental data by Bakhtar [7], and even in this case P 0 is lower than 35 bar, with a corresponding reduced pressure of only 0.15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The droplet size is strongly affected by the equation of state in the wet-steam model, as in Halama and Fort (2013) and Grubel et al (2014). However, the droplet radius has been underestimated in many numerical studies (e.g., Dykas & Wroblewski, 2012;Yang & Shen, 2009) and measurement uncertainty should be taken into account due to its small size. For wet-steam parameters (nucleation rate, wetness and supercooling level) there is no available experiment data.…”
Section: Moore Nozzle B (Moore Et Al 1973)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the thermophysical models used in the study were defined by polynomial equations with many complicated terms. Dykas et al (2012) reported an experimental and numerical study considering a real gas equation of state for a wet-steam flow in a high-pressure nozzle. They continued to use a conventional condensation model based on classical condensation theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%