2017
DOI: 10.9753/icce.v35.waves.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modeling of the Interactions Between Nonlinear Waves and Arbitrarily Flexible Vegetation

Abstract: Coastal wetlands are among the natural features with the capability to dissipate wave energy and reduce storm damage. Inadequate representation of wave and vegetation characteristics in numerical models may reduce their capability in predicting wave processes over wetlands. Previous numerical wave models have typically applied simplifications on vegetation behavior. For instance, vegetation stems were usually assumed to be rigid or semi-flexible and thus extreme stem deflections could not be captured. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The swaying motions of flexible vegetation stems modify u in equation (1) as the relative velocity u r = u − u v , where u v is the vegetation swaying velocity. The dynamic interactions between waves and flexible vegetation have been studied through physical experiments and numerical models (e.g., Abdolahpour et al, 2017;Luhar & Nepf, 2016;Mattis et al, 2015;Mullarney & Henderson, 2010;Tahvildari, 2017;Zhu & Chen, 2015). Due to the complexity of modeling flexible vegetation, the present study focuses on f d (t, z) induced by rigid vegetation, simplified as rigid cylinders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The swaying motions of flexible vegetation stems modify u in equation (1) as the relative velocity u r = u − u v , where u v is the vegetation swaying velocity. The dynamic interactions between waves and flexible vegetation have been studied through physical experiments and numerical models (e.g., Abdolahpour et al, 2017;Luhar & Nepf, 2016;Mattis et al, 2015;Mullarney & Henderson, 2010;Tahvildari, 2017;Zhu & Chen, 2015). Due to the complexity of modeling flexible vegetation, the present study focuses on f d (t, z) induced by rigid vegetation, simplified as rigid cylinders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model accounts for stem drag, inertial, skin friction, and buoyancy forces. This model has previously been coupled with a Boussinesq-type wave model for a single (Tahvildari, 2017) and multiple (Tahvildari and Zeller, submitted) vegetation stems. Since Bossiness-type models are limited to shallow water waves, vertical variability of flow and vegetation response may not be captured adequately.…”
Section: Numerical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among other methods associated with remote sensing data, digital processing of images acquired through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) represents a promising tool for mapping the most relevant riparian vegetation parameters within vegetated water bodies. UAV-based multi and hyperspectral images have been largely applied in many forestry and precision agriculture studies [12][13][14][15][16]. However, a methodology for predicting the main hydrodynamic features of real vegetated water bodies based on these approaches is still an open research window.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%