2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of the fire–structure behavior of steel beam-to-column connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, analytical formulas for assessing loadbearing capacity have been developed for beams and columns with thermal gradients [15, 44 -50], for composite elements such as concrete filled hollow steel section or I-column or beam sections with concrete between the flanges [16,51] and also for beam-column connections [89]. On the other hand, an analytical calculation method was developed for structural elements located outside the burning building and subjected to heat coming from external flames passing through windows [15,16,52].…”
Section: (B) Analytical Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, analytical formulas for assessing loadbearing capacity have been developed for beams and columns with thermal gradients [15, 44 -50], for composite elements such as concrete filled hollow steel section or I-column or beam sections with concrete between the flanges [16,51] and also for beam-column connections [89]. On the other hand, an analytical calculation method was developed for structural elements located outside the burning building and subjected to heat coming from external flames passing through windows [15,16,52].…”
Section: (B) Analytical Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dog-bone beam was first used by Engelhardt [22] to increase the seismic resistance of steel frame. Lee [23] found that that the adoption of the dog-bone beam can also avoid the fracture of the connection region in a fire situation. …”
Section: Geometry Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the location of the cut section and the depth of circular cutting will affect the behaviour of a beam in fire. Using numerical analysis, Lee et al [15] found that, unlike ordinary beam-to-column connections, RBS joints subject to fire, mainly failed by local buckling at the top flange and web of the RBS region. However, the effects of the geometrical size of the RBS zone and the beam-end restraints on the fire resistance of RBS joint have not been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%