1979
DOI: 10.2172/5770075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of sympathetic detonation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated fraction reacted increased with the increase of detonation velocity and pressure and the values were in a range of 58 to 85 %. These values show the coincidence with the calculation for ANFO done by Mader [9]. Although the estimated fraction reacted of detonation velocity showed a good agreement with D obs /D cal values for each condition, those of pressure didn't show an agreement with P obs /P cal values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The estimated fraction reacted increased with the increase of detonation velocity and pressure and the values were in a range of 58 to 85 %. These values show the coincidence with the calculation for ANFO done by Mader [9]. Although the estimated fraction reacted of detonation velocity showed a good agreement with D obs /D cal values for each condition, those of pressure didn't show an agreement with P obs /P cal values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The suspension method is widely accepted to measure the sym pathetic detonation of commercial explosives by observing if there is any residual explosive in the blasting area. Other judging means includes an indicator plate [34][35][36][37] and the optical method [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm the reliability of theoretical model and parameters used in this paper, we calculated the detonation properties of a variety of explosives, see the Table 1. Detonation velocities and detomation pressures of eight kinds of explosives calculated in our work as well as experimental data [14] are listed in Table 1. From the comparison, we find that the calculated value in this paper is well consistent with the experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%