Salt Sediment Interactions and Hydrocarbon Prospectivity: Concepts, Applications, and Case Studies for the 21st Century: 24th A 2004
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.04.24.0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modeling of Salt Tectonics on Passive Continental Margins: Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of Sediment Loading, Buoyancy, Margin Tilt, and Isostasy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9). In such models, the frontal boundary can be considered as free, as stated by Ings and Shimeld (2006). Such an initial condition, which is considered necessary to allow the development of minibasins (Gemmer et al, 2005), is somewhat difficult to reconcile with the fact that in these models, the water depth is around 4500 m at the onset of sedimentation.…”
Section: The Hypothesis Of a Seaward Free Boundarymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…9). In such models, the frontal boundary can be considered as free, as stated by Ings and Shimeld (2006). Such an initial condition, which is considered necessary to allow the development of minibasins (Gemmer et al, 2005), is somewhat difficult to reconcile with the fact that in these models, the water depth is around 4500 m at the onset of sedimentation.…”
Section: The Hypothesis Of a Seaward Free Boundarymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, some salt basins could have initially been narrower e e.g. in Nova Scotia: possibly less than 100 km (Ings and Shimeld, 2006;Albertz et al, 2010). Other basins are obviously larger e e.g.…”
Section: Salt Basin Size and Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Batchelor 2000; Turcotte & Schubert 2002) have been applied to a wide range of geodynamic processes including: (1) asthenospheric counterflow (Chase 1979;Turcotte & Schubert 2002); (2) mechanics of continental extension (Kusznir & Matthews 1988;Block & Royden 1990;Birger 1991;Kruse et al 1991;McKenzie et al 2000;McKenzie & Jackson 2002); (3) continental plateau formation and evolution, both in extension and compression (Zhao & Morgan 1987;Block & Royden 1990;Wernicke 1990;Bird 1991;Fielding et al (Johnston et al 2000;Beaumont et al 2001Beaumont et al , 2004Beaumont et al , 2006Grujic et al 2002Grujic et al , 2004Williams & Jiang 2005; (5) metamorphic histories in large, hot, collisional orogens (Jamieson et al 2002; (6) subduction zone flow regimes under both lithostatic and overpressured conditions (Bird 1978;England & Holland 1979;Shreve & Cloos 1986;Peacock 1992;Mancktelow 1995;Gerya & St6ckhert 2002); and (7) deformation along passive continental margins in the presence of salt layers Ings et al 2004). For all these examples, with the exception of salt tectonics, the most likely cause for weakening in the channel is partial melting.…”
Section: Channel Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%