2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1610806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of magnetoelectric effect in a composite structure

Abstract: The mechanical coupling effect in a magnetoelectric (ME) composite structure in which a magnetostrictive component is bonded with a piezoelectric one is simulated by numerical technique, focusing on an optimization of the magnetoelectric coupling output. The simulation starts from an experimentally developed ME composite structure and takes into account the mechanical coupling mechanism between the two components. A numerical optimization algorithm is developed, predicting a significant enhancement of the ME o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In addition, most layered ME composite theoretical models stressed on the influence of thickness ratio of ferromagnetic and ferroelectric phases, but paid no attention on the influence of in-plane sizes on ME coefficient. [20][21][22][23] In fact, the magnetostrictivity is largely dependent on in-plane sizes due to shape demagnetization effect, so ME coefficients α E,31 and α E,32 would be different. But no article reported the relationship between ME effect and shape demagnetization effect for plate layered ME composites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In addition, most layered ME composite theoretical models stressed on the influence of thickness ratio of ferromagnetic and ferroelectric phases, but paid no attention on the influence of in-plane sizes on ME coefficient. [20][21][22][23] In fact, the magnetostrictivity is largely dependent on in-plane sizes due to shape demagnetization effect, so ME coefficients α E,31 and α E,32 would be different. But no article reported the relationship between ME effect and shape demagnetization effect for plate layered ME composites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 ͑iii͒ A high ME coefficient near the EMR is characterized by a sharp peak with a very narrow range of magnetic dc biases. [6][7][8][9] In conjunction with the fact that EMR in laminate composites is dependent upon the dimensions, this last observation has limited the application of ME composites in magnetic field sensing; i.e., large dimensions are required to achieve a low EMR frequency. The most common mode utilized in sensing is the longitudinaltransversal mode ͑LT͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) [10], [11]. The magnetostrictive direction of the MSCP is in its longitudinal direction, while the polarization direction of the PECP is along its thickness direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%