2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation on the hydrodynamic performance of a new designed breakwater using smoothed particle hydrodynamic method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 𝑋 ⃗ ∈ 𝛬 ∪ 𝑆 . Equation ( 15) defines the source strength over the mean wetted hull surface as follows, based on the hull surface boundary condition provided by Equation (6).…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 𝑋 ⃗ ∈ 𝛬 ∪ 𝑆 . Equation ( 15) defines the source strength over the mean wetted hull surface as follows, based on the hull surface boundary condition provided by Equation (6).…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are typically constructed using massive concrete blocks, rocks, or other durable materials. Fixed breakwaters provide robust protection against wave forces but are often more expensive and challenging to construct compared to FBWs [6,7]. FBWs are particularly suitable for calm coastal conditions where wave energy is relatively lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that because DualSPHysics is an open-source platform, it can be efficiently coupled with other solvers. For instance, Cui et al [194]…”
Section: Multibody Coupling and Mooring Hydrodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, the coupled DualSPHysics-MoorDyn was applied by Liu and Wang [73] to compare the hydrodynamic performance of floating breakwaters with six different cross-sections (Figure 1v). Most recently, Cui et al [74] compiled the open-source mooring analysis program MAP++ [75] into the SPH code to predict the hydrodynamic performance of a multi-module floating breakwater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, the coupled DualSPHysics-MoorDyn was applied by Liu and Wang [73] to compare the hydrodynamic performance of floating breakwaters with six different cross-sections (Figure 1v). Most recently, Cui et al [74] compiled the open-source mooring analysis program MAP++ [75] into the SPH code to predict the hydrodynamic performance of a multi-module floating breakwater. [5]; (e) Pontoon with an air chamber [6]; (f) Pontoon with two air chambers [7]; (g) Permeable structure [8]; (h) Y-Type pontoon [9]; (i) Trapezoidal pontoon-porous plates [10]; (j) Horizontal plate-nets [11]; (k) Dual cuboid pontoon [12]; (l) Dual cylindrical pontoon [13]; (m) Dual cylindrical pontoon-nets [14]; (n) Triple cuboid pontoons [15]; (o) Double-row cuboid pontoons [16]; (p) Double-row cuboid pontoons-mesh cage [17]; (q) Double-row cylindrical pontoons-mesh cage [18]; (r) F-type pontoon [19]; (s) Trapezoidal porous pontoons [20]; (t) T-type pontoon [24];…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%