Numerical investigation of the separation mechanism in an electrostatic aerosol-to-hydrosol separator by glow corona discharge: a quantitative comparison of the effects of ionic wind and Coulomb force

Abstract

Electrostatic separation of particles from air onto a liquid surface has attracted increasing attention for various applications such as wet electrostatic precipitators and bioaerosol samplers. In this study, the electrostatic separation of particles onto the liquid surface is numerically modeled in a simplified manner. The simulated separation efficiency is validated by experimental values reported in literature. The effects of ionic wind and Coulombic force on particle separation for various electrical mobilities, applied voltages, and air flow rates are studied by decomposing the total separation efficiency into two components: Coulombic and ionic-wind separation efficiencies. Both Coulombic and ionic-wind separation efficiencies show the same behaviors as the total separation efficiency with changes in the operating conditions: they increase with increasing applied voltage and particle electrical mobility, and with decreasing air flow rate. Overall, the ionic-wind separation efficiency is higher than the Coulombic separation efficiency, mainly because of the short residence time. However, when the applied voltage and particle electrical mobility are high, and the air flow rate is low, the Coulombic force outperforms the ionic wind. Time-scale analysis well explains the relations between the relative importance of each separation mechanism and the operating parameters.

High air flow-rate electrostatic sampler for the rapid monitoring of airborne coronavirus and influenza viruses

“…There were no differences in the collection efficiency for these virus species, even though the MS2 bacteriophage is smaller than that of A/H1N1 and A/H3N2. According to Kim et al, 2020a , Kim et al, 2020b , the collection efficiency of an air sampler such as the HAFES is determined by the combined effects of ionic wind and the Coulombic force. They reported that the collection efficiency due to the ionic wind effect for 30-nm particles (similar to the size of the MS2 bacteriophage) is lower than that for 100-nm particles (similar to the sizes of A/H1N1 and A/H3N2).…”

“…In Eq. (1) , denotes the EC of ATH sampling ( Kim et al, 2020a , Kim et al, 2020b ): where is the flow rate of the air, is the flow rate of the carrier liquid, and is the viral collection efficiency of the air sampler. Yang et al (2011) reported that there are relatively low concentrations of virus particles in indoor air (10 3 –10 4 viral genome copies per 1 m 3 of air) even during an influenza epidemic.…”