2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijtpp3010005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of Secondary Flow and Loss Development in a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade with Divergent Endwalls

Abstract: Secondary flow and loss development in the T106Div-EIZ low-pressure turbine cascade are investigated utilizing (U)RANS simulations in cases with and without periodically incoming wakes at Ma 2th = 0.59 and Re 2th = 2 × 10 5 . The predictions are compared to experimental data presented by Kirik and Niehuis (2015). The axial mid-span and overall loss development in the T106Div-EIZ and the T106A-EIZ in the steady case are analyzed regarding the effects caused by the different loading distributions and by the dive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the axially varying effect of unsteady inflow conditions, decreasing the inlet endwall boundary layer height results in a nearly constant reduction of the endwall loss generation, beginning around the midpoint of the blade passage where the secondary flow is formed. Lastly, the effect of increased frontal blade loading leads to a rise in profile losses in the front part of the passage followed by increased secondary losses due to stronger transverse pressure gradients [49].…”
Section: Current Investigations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the axially varying effect of unsteady inflow conditions, decreasing the inlet endwall boundary layer height results in a nearly constant reduction of the endwall loss generation, beginning around the midpoint of the blade passage where the secondary flow is formed. Lastly, the effect of increased frontal blade loading leads to a rise in profile losses in the front part of the passage followed by increased secondary losses due to stronger transverse pressure gradients [49].…”
Section: Current Investigations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the pressure surface separation does not significantly alter the total number of losses but rather redistributes them throughout the blade passage. In addition, other researchers [1,[14][15][16][17][18] such as Lin et al [17] investigated the mechanism of local entropy generation to understand losses in compressible flow through a high-pressure single-entry turbine. They concluded that the entropy generation rate, which is a useful parameter for calculating local and overall losses, is influenced by two main parameters: viscous irreversibility and heat transfer irreversibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of double-entry turbines [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], especially with asymmetric volute in secondary flow research, is limited compared to single-entry turbines, which have received extensive attention [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In addition, the influence of nozzle vanes on the secondary flow development and centrifugal pressure head did not achieve much attention in the public domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow visualization studies by Goldstein and Spores [15], Langston et al [16], Sieverding and Bosche [17], and Wang et al [18] have indicated that the pressure-side leg of the horseshoe vortex is a dominant constituent of the passage vortex system. Ciorciar et al investigated the effect of periodically incoming wakes on the axial loss development [19]. They found higher front-loading results in a lower intensity of the secondary flow downstream of the trailing edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%