2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical determination of hysteresis friction on different length scales and comparison to experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the formulation of the friction coefficient given in (9) and from the definition of the neuronal output shown in (7) and (8), the derivative…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the formulation of the friction coefficient given in (9) and from the definition of the neuronal output shown in (7) and (8), the derivative…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical approaches introducing friction theories considering surface roughness are proposed by Klüppel and Heinrich [2,3] as well as by Persson [4]. Furthermore, numerical approaches for the modelling of friction are developed, which are based on the finite element method, multiscale analysis, and homogenization; see [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified versions of the Archard model have been used to predict wear rates and contain the related variables and parameters in a system [23]. Moreover, experimental and numerical investigations of friction and wear have been ongoing, from the atomic level [24][25][26][27] to the continuum level [28][29][30][31][32][33], to the environmental level regarding tyre and road wear particles (TRWP) [34,35]. Ultimately, it has been difficult to develop a comprehensive model that concisely expresses multiscale wear phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%