2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigations on the influence of preheating and dilution on transition of laminar coflow diffusion flames to Mild combustion regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were reported in jet in hot crossflow [12]. The importance of autoignition appearing at the most reactive mixture fraction, Z MR , was also noted in [13] at the flame base. These kernels then propagated towards stoichiometric and richer mixture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similar observations were reported in jet in hot crossflow [12]. The importance of autoignition appearing at the most reactive mixture fraction, Z MR , was also noted in [13] at the flame base. These kernels then propagated towards stoichiometric and richer mixture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…De Joannon et al [2,3] studied a methane counterflow configuration with various hot and diluted fuel and oxidiser conditions, commenting on significant changes introduced with preheat and dilution to the Heat Release Rate (HRR), including the appearance of a double-peaked HRR profile and a lack of correlation of the highest HRR peak with the stoichiometric mixture fraction, depending on dilution configuration. Steady methane counterflow flames reported by Abtahizadeh et al [12,13] showed extended HRR regions and reduced NO formation with preheat and dilution, while autoignition behaviour depended on whether the reactant oxidiser, fuel, or both were diluted with hot combustion products. Sorrentino et al [14] performed a similar study investigating non-premixed autoignition behaviour with an inert diluent, concluding that, in agreement with [13], autoignition behaviour depended heavily on dilution configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steady methane counterflow flames reported by Abtahizadeh et al [12,13] showed extended HRR regions and reduced NO formation with preheat and dilution, while autoignition behaviour depended on whether the reactant oxidiser, fuel, or both were diluted with hot combustion products. Sorrentino et al [14] performed a similar study investigating non-premixed autoignition behaviour with an inert diluent, concluding that, in agreement with [13], autoignition behaviour depended heavily on dilution configuration. Coriton et al [5] commented on the lack of sudden extinction associated with MILD flames, a finding also evident in earlier work [1,9,10], and discussed differences in behaviour based on the composition and temperature of hot product diluent in turbulent experimental [15] and laminar numerical [5] methane counterflow flames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MILD combustion has been studied extensively using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) as well. Abtahizadeh et al and Sepman et al investigated the laminar JHC burner from University of Groningen using detailed chemistry (Abtahizadeh et al, 2013;Sepman et al, 2013b). In the former study, the effects of preheating and dilution were investigated, and it was found that in the presence of both preheating and dilution, the flame transitions into the MILD regime, and stabilizes via autoignition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%