2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigations on supersonic ejectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
128
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…K-Ȧ SST turbulence model was used in this case. This model is suitable for calculation of flow in supersonic ejectors as it was stated in previous works [5,6,7]. For further information see documentation [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…K-Ȧ SST turbulence model was used in this case. This model is suitable for calculation of flow in supersonic ejectors as it was stated in previous works [5,6,7]. For further information see documentation [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…E.g. Bartosiewicz et al used this model in work [5], Simak in work [6] and Kolar and Dvorak in work [7].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k − model uses the Sarkar formulation , which is applied over the whole computational domain, while the k − ω − sst uses the Wilcox formulation depending on the local flow conditions; both formulation and details can be found in [3,4]. This validation was done for the whole range of ejector operations (on-design, off-design) and for different driving pressures: P 0 1 = 3bar, P 0 1 = 4bar, P 0 1 = 5bar and P 0 1 = 6bar.…”
Section: Cfd Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Judging from recent studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], computational fluid dynamics becomes a usual tool to investigate and predict ejectors global operation, understand the complex local flow physics and its link with the overall performances, in order to perform better design of this device or the cycle. However, in a previous paper [1], authors pointed out some shortcomings usually done by using the CFD approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%