2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of unsteady aerodynamics of floating offshore wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For future measurements, the calibration of the (conical) five-hole probes could simply be expanded to larger angles up to ±40 • (Fingersh and Robinson, 1998). This then allows for a lower TAS of the UAV, which in turn results in lower pressures at the pressure transducers and a better spacial resolution of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For future measurements, the calibration of the (conical) five-hole probes could simply be expanded to larger angles up to ±40 • (Fingersh and Robinson, 1998). This then allows for a lower TAS of the UAV, which in turn results in lower pressures at the pressure transducers and a better spacial resolution of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modelled rotor is a stand-alone generic model of the Enercon E-112 WEC rotor, based on free-access airfoil data. For more details regarding the numerical methods, please refer to Cormier et al (2018) in which the same methods have been applied and described. Figures 5 and 6 give a qualitative impression of the presence of the WEC wake.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modelled rotor is a stand alone generic recreation of the Enercon E-112 WEC rotor, based on free access airfoil data. For more details regarding the numerical methods, please refer to Cormier et al (2018) in which the same methods have been applied and described. Figures 5 and 6 give a qualitative impression of the presence of the WEC wake.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latter were investigated by (Bayati et al, 2017b(Bayati et al, , 2018b and an overview of the main results was given in Bayati et al (2018a). Concerning CFD results, only those obtained with the axisymmetric model were published in Cormier et al (2018) and included in the final project report (2018). Moreover, an inconsistency in the set up of several simulations was later discovered, explaining the large discrepancies found in the comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%