“…For each different nanocone height we can point out i) a temperature gradient, as promoted by the thermal hotspot, is associated with an apex resonance, EM hotspot, that effectively localizes the EM power in the apex, ii) while the nanocone first order resonance generally produces the largest near field enhancement, [57] the high-order resonances even though carrying less pronounced near field enhancements (more evident in longer cones) tend to more effectively localize the EM power density in the apex (see also Figure S5, Supporting Information), and iii) a high field enhancement does not necessarily imply a strong temperature gradient, instead, a strong temperature gradient in the nanocone requires the proper combination of high EM power absorption in the apex volume (thus establishing a dominant heat source localized at the apex) with well-defined EM hotspots. Furthermore, by increasing the nanocone height, a red-shift of the apex resonances, evidenced in the electric field enhancement, can be observed [57,59] together with a red-shift of both the apex power peaks and the temperature gradient. Interestingly, an increase of the cone height also determines an increase of the generated temperature gradient, a trend easily understood by recalling that a longer cone means longer distance between the thermal hotspot, located at the cone apex, and the cone base.…”