2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of the DCB test configuration applicability to mechanically coupled Fiber Reinforced Laminated Composite beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to their high load-carrying capacity, composite structures are most often subjected to axial compression processes. As shown by Samborski [11,12], determination of resistance to damage for laminates can be a challenge, especially in the case of non-symmetric layups. However, a proper mode separation procedures supported with the finite element simulations can precisely foresee and track the interlaminar defect propagation [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their high load-carrying capacity, composite structures are most often subjected to axial compression processes. As shown by Samborski [11,12], determination of resistance to damage for laminates can be a challenge, especially in the case of non-symmetric layups. However, a proper mode separation procedures supported with the finite element simulations can precisely foresee and track the interlaminar defect propagation [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three laminated specimens with different stacking sequences were ideally built as follows. We started from a typical carbon-epoxy fiber-reinforced lamina of thickness t p = 0.2 mm and elastic moduli shown in Table 1 [61]. Based on this, three stacking sequences were designed corresponding to uni-directional (UD), cross-ply (CP), and multi-directional (MD) sublaminates (Table 2).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debonded region of the specimen is modelled by a real gap of h 1 100 along the damaged interface. The contact and friction conditions similar to (5) and (6) are introduced between the faces of finite elements along the pre-cracked interface. The contact behaviour under the assumptions of small displacement kinematics was assumed to be governed by the 'hard contact' model with frictionless conditions [26].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface strength can be quantified using the concept of interface fracture toughness [4]. In this respect, fracture specimens are used to supply useful information regarding the fracture resistance of the material [5,6]. The near-tip fracture parameters such stress intensity factors or strain energy release rates controlling the fracture event can be inferred from the specimens through experimental, analytical or numerical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%