2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12060955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis and Its Laboratory Verification in Bending Test of Glue Laminated Timber Pre-Cracked Beam

Abstract: The paper describes an approach to model glue laminated timber (GLT) made of pinewood (softwood), taking into account damage processes in timber and adhesive layers. An example of a pre-cracked beam has been presented. Obtaining necessary material properties has been supported by several finite elements models (FEM), laboratory tests and a wide literature survey. The authors have taken into consideration an orthotropic material with damage for timber lamellas and isotropic traction separation law for bonding l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical and laboratory test results differed slightly. Similar conclusions were drawn in a study by [6], in which some methods were compared. Usually, variance results are mainly from the different properties of the materials used (Young's modulus, mass density), the impossible simulation of ambient conditions present during the performance of the tests (temperature, wind load), as well as the boundary conditions (joints, boundary conditions to the ground) [7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The numerical and laboratory test results differed slightly. Similar conclusions were drawn in a study by [6], in which some methods were compared. Usually, variance results are mainly from the different properties of the materials used (Young's modulus, mass density), the impossible simulation of ambient conditions present during the performance of the tests (temperature, wind load), as well as the boundary conditions (joints, boundary conditions to the ground) [7].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The damage initiation criteria utilised in this model are based on the Hashin damage model which has been utilised in a series of studies to determine the failure behaviour of timber elements [27][28][29][30][31]. The damage initiation criteria are expressed in terms of strains and are treated differently for tension and compression strains however, one affects the other and if the strains are significant and cause partial or full damage (damage variable greater than zero) both tensile and compressive responses are affected.…”
Section: Finite Element Model 41 Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%