2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2016.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuisances sonores en réanimation néonatale : impact d’un outil de monitorage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the maximum noise levels recorded exceeded the recommended maximum of 65 dBA in all but 2 of the night shifts. Area noise levels more than the AAP recommendations have been reported across other studies ( Darcy et al 2008 ; Brown 2009 ; Degorre et al 2017 ; Ahamed et al 2018 ), and the excessive noise levels have been largely attributable to equipment use and staff behaviour within the NICU environment ( Lasky and Williams 2009 ; Degorre et al 2017 ). Average measured noise levels inside the NICU on a normal working day have previously been recorded as 77 ± 5 dB ( Salama et al 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Furthermore, the maximum noise levels recorded exceeded the recommended maximum of 65 dBA in all but 2 of the night shifts. Area noise levels more than the AAP recommendations have been reported across other studies ( Darcy et al 2008 ; Brown 2009 ; Degorre et al 2017 ; Ahamed et al 2018 ), and the excessive noise levels have been largely attributable to equipment use and staff behaviour within the NICU environment ( Lasky and Williams 2009 ; Degorre et al 2017 ). Average measured noise levels inside the NICU on a normal working day have previously been recorded as 77 ± 5 dB ( Salama et al 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We found that the majority of health professionals (73%) acknowledge possessing adequate knowledge about the topic of noise, but, similarly to the study by Daniele et al (2012), the majority (58%) has little knowledge about the recommended dB values for the NICU. Nevertheless, the majority of the professionals (98%) consider that the unit exceeds the recommended noise levels and is seemingly aware of the need for intervention of noise control/ reduction in the unit (Degorre et al, 2017;Santana et al, 2015). We found that 23.1% of the professionals indicate that most of the times there is a concern about the noise and 65.4% reported that sometimes they worry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As stated by Santana et al (2015), only with a policy of continued education and the involvement of all professionals will the effects occur in the NICU environment. Degorre et al (2017) report that the lack of systematic monitoring of noise level does not allow its control and does not promote the implementation and maintenance of measures for the reduction of noise levels. The interest in this study relates to the importance of promoting an environment that boosts the physiological stability of the NB and decreases the environment's negative impact, optimizing his/her growth and development and simultaneously providing the well-being of families and health professionals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the presence of newborns' parents, who are allowed to stay in the NICU, contributes to increased noise levels, but, encouraging conversations between parents and their newborns is beneficial for family bonding and the development of the newborn [39,44,48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%