Nuevas combinaciones en Orchidaceae de México

Solano, Rodolfo; Salazar, Gerardo A.; Estrada, R.

doi:10.21829/abm97.2011.249

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The species concerned, originally described as Deiregyne confusa Garay, lived up to its species epithet; it had combinations in Funkiella , Spiranthes and Schiedeella before turning up in an isolated position as sister to Svenkoeltzia . Solano, Salazar & Jiménez () merged Microthelys Garay with Funkiella ; the species assigned to these genera are mingled in the molecular phylogenetic trees (Salazar, ). A better sampled study of Spiranthinae is nearing completion (G. Salazar et al ., unpubl.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An updated classification of Orchidaceae

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the last classification of Orchidaceae in 2003, there has been major progress in the determination of relationships, and we present here a revised classification including a list of all 736 currently recognized genera. A number of generic changes have occurred in Orchideae (Orchidoideae), but the majority of changes have occurred in Epidendroideae. In the latter, almost all of the problematic placements recognized in the previous classification 11 years ago have now been resolved. In Epidendroideae, we have recognized three new tribes (relative to the last classification): Thaieae (monogeneric) for Thaia, which was previously considered to be the only taxon incertae sedis; Xerorchideae (monogeneric) for Xerorchis; and Wullschlaegelieae for achlorophyllous Wullschlaegelia, which had tentatively been placed in Calypsoeae. Another genus, Devogelia, takes the place of Thaia as incertae sedis in Epidendroideae. Gastrodieae are clearly placed among the tribes in the neottioid grade, with Neottieae sister to the remainder of Epidendroideae. Arethuseae are sister to the rest of the higher Epidendroideae, which is unsurprising given their mostly soft pollinia. Tribal relationships within Epidendroideae have been much clarified by analyses of multiple plastid DNA regions and the low-copy nuclear gene Xdh. Four major clades within the remainder of Epidendroideae are recognized: Vandeae/Podochileae/Collabieae, Cymbidieae, Malaxideae and Epidendreae, the last now including Calypsoinae (previously recognized as a tribe on its own) and Agrostophyllinae s.s. Agrostophyllinae and Collabiinae were unplaced subtribes in the 2003 classification. The former are now split between two subtribes, Agrostophyllinae s.s. and Adrorhizinae, the first now included in Epidendreae and the second in Vandeae. Collabiinae, also probably related to Vandeae, are now elevated to a tribe along with Podochileae. Malaxis and relatives are placed in Malaxidinae and included with Dendrobiinae in Malaxideae. The increased resolution and content of larger clades, recognized here as tribes, do not support the 'phylads' in Epidendroideae proposed 22 years ago by Dressler.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An updated classification of Orchidaceae

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…La presencia de las poblaciones mexicanas de L. fratercula y L. quetzalensis amplía la distribución conocida de ambas especies, las cuales hasta hace poco eran consideradas endemismos restringidos de Guatemala; la primera de ellas, recientemente ha sido registrada también en Honduras. Destaca la importancia del Soconusco, Chiapas, una región de alta biodiversidad y bien explorada botánicamente, en la cual aún es posible descubrir novedades para la flora orquideológica mexicana; además de L. fratercula, en la década actual ahí se han descubierto para el país Acianthera herrerae (Luer) (Damon et al, 2015;Solano, Salazar et al, 2011;Solano et al, 2016).…”

Section: Comentarios Taxonómicosunclassified

“…La región de Chiapas donde fueron recolectados estos ejemplares, el Soconusco, ha sido relativamente bien explorada botánicamente desde hace 8 décadas, especialmente para epífitas vasculares (Damon, Almeida-Cerino, Valle-Mora, Bertolini y López-Urbina, 2015;Long y Heath, 1991;Martínez-Meléndez, Pérez-Farrera y Farrera-Sarmiento, 2008;Martínez-Meléndez, Pérez-Farrera y Martínez-Camilo, 2009; Martínez-Meléndez, Martínez-Camilo, Pérez-Farrera y Martínez-Meléndez, 2011; Martínez-Camilo, Pérez-Farrera y Matuda, 1950a, b;Pérez-Farrera, 2004;Pérez-Farrera y Miceli-Méndez, 2004;Pérez-Farrera, Martínez-Camilo, Martínez-Meléndez, Farrera-Sarmiento y Maza-Villalobos, 2012;Solano et al, 2016). No obstante, el trabajo florístico ahí realizado en los últimos años sigue proporcionando novedades para la flora de México (Solano, Jiménez-Machorro y Damon, 2011;Solano, Salazar y Jiménez-Machorro, 2011;Solano, Damon, Cruz-Lustre, Jiménez-Bautista, Avendaño-Vázquez.y Bertolini, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified