DNA barcoding involves sequencing a standard region of DNA as a tool for species identification. However, there has been no agreement on which region(s) should be used for barcoding land plants. To provide a community recommendation on a standard plant barcode, we have compared the performance of 7 leading candidate plastid DNA regions (atpF-atpH spacer, matK gene, rbcL gene, rpoB gene, rpoC1 gene, psbK-psbI spacer, and trnH-psbA spacer). Based on assessments of recoverability, sequence quality, and levels of species discrimination, we recommend the 2-locus combination of rbcL؉matK as the plant barcode. This core 2-locus barcode will provide a universal framework for the routine use of DNA sequence data to identify specimens and contribute toward the discovery of overlooked species of land plants.matK ͉ rbcL ͉ species identification L arge-scale standardized sequencing of the mitochondrial gene CO1 has made DNA barcoding an efficient species identification tool in many animal groups (1). In plants, however, low substitution rates of mitochondrial DNA have led to the search for alternative barcoding regions. From initial investigations of plastid regions (2-4), 7 leading candidates have emerged (5, 6). Four are portions of coding genes (matK, rbcL, rpoB, and rpoC1), and 3 are noncoding spacers (atpF-atpH, trnH-psbA, and psbK-psbI). Different research groups have proposed various combinations of these loci as their preferred plant barcodes, but no consensus has emerged (5-12). This lack of an agreed standard has impeded progress in plant barcoding.Our aim here is to identify a standard DNA barcode for land plants. To achieve this goal, we have pooled data across laboratories including sequence data from 907 samples, representing 445 angiosperm, 38 gymnosperm, and 67 cryptogam species. Using various subsets of these data, we evaluated the 7 candidate loci using criteria in the Consortium for the Barcode of Life's (CBOL) data standards and guidelines for locus selection (http:// www.barcoding.si.edu/protocols.html). Universality: Which loci can be routinely sequenced across the land plants? Sequence quality and coverage: Which loci are most amenable to the production of bidirectional sequences with few or no ambiguous base calls? Discrimination: Which loci enable most species to be distinguished? ResultsUniversality. Direct universality assessments using a single primer pair for each locus in angiosperms resulted in 90%-98% PCR and sequencing success for 6/7 regions. Success for the seventh region, psbK-psbI, was 77% (Fig. 1A). Greater problems were encountered in other land plant groups, with rpoB, matK, atpF-atpH, and psbK-psbI all showing Ͻ50% success in gymnosperms and/or cryptogams based on data compiled from several laboratories (Fig. 1 A).Sequence Quality. Evaluation of sequence quality and coverage from the candidate loci demonstrated that high quality bidirectional sequences were routinely obtained from rbcL, rpoC1, and rpoB (Fig. 1B, x axis). The remaining 4 loci required more manual editing and produced f...

Since the last classification of Orchidaceae in 2003, there has been major progress in the determination of relationships, and we present here a revised classification including a list of all 736 currently recognized genera. A number of generic changes have occurred in Orchideae (Orchidoideae), but the majority of changes have occurred in Epidendroideae. In the latter, almost all of the problematic placements recognized in the previous classification 11 years ago have now been resolved. In Epidendroideae, we have recognized three new tribes (relative to the last classification): Thaieae (monogeneric) for Thaia, which was previously considered to be the only taxon incertae sedis; Xerorchideae (monogeneric) for Xerorchis; and Wullschlaegelieae for achlorophyllous Wullschlaegelia, which had tentatively been placed in Calypsoeae. Another genus, Devogelia, takes the place of Thaia as incertae sedis in Epidendroideae. Gastrodieae are clearly placed among the tribes in the neottioid grade, with Neottieae sister to the remainder of Epidendroideae. Arethuseae are sister to the rest of the higher Epidendroideae, which is unsurprising given their mostly soft pollinia. Tribal relationships within Epidendroideae have been much clarified by analyses of multiple plastid DNA regions and the low-copy nuclear gene Xdh. Four major clades within the remainder of Epidendroideae are recognized: Vandeae/Podochileae/Collabieae, Cymbidieae, Malaxideae and Epidendreae, the last now including Calypsoinae (previously recognized as a tribe on its own) and Agrostophyllinae s.s. Agrostophyllinae and Collabiinae were unplaced subtribes in the 2003 classification. The former are now split between two subtribes, Agrostophyllinae s.s. and Adrorhizinae, the first now included in Epidendreae and the second in Vandeae. Collabiinae, also probably related to Vandeae, are now elevated to a tribe along with Podochileae. Malaxis and relatives are placed in Malaxidinae and included with Dendrobiinae in Malaxideae. The increased resolution and content of larger clades, recognized here as tribes, do not support the 'phylads' in Epidendroideae proposed 22 years ago by Dressler.

Orchids are the most diverse family of angiosperms, with over 25 000 species, more than mammals, birds and reptiles combined. Tests of hypotheses to account for such diversity have been stymied by the lack of a fully resolved broad-scale phylogeny. Here, we provide such a phylogeny, based on 75 chloroplast genes for 39 species representing all orchid subfamilies and 16 of 17 tribes, time-calibrated against 17 angiosperm fossils. A supermatrix analysis places an additional 144 species based on three plastid genes. Orchids appear to have arisen roughly 112 million years ago (Mya); the subfamilies Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae diverged from each other at the end of the Cretaceous; and the eight tribes and three previously unplaced subtribes of the upper epidendroids diverged rapidly from each other between 37.9 and 30.8 Mya. Orchids appear to have undergone one significant acceleration of net species diversification in the orchidoids, and two accelerations and one deceleration in the upper epidendroids. Consistent with theory, such accelerations were correlated with the evolution of pollinia, the epiphytic habit, CAM photosynthesis, tropical distribution (especially in extensive cordilleras), and pollination via Lepidoptera or euglossine bees. Deceit pollination appears to have elevated the number of orchid species by one-half but not via acceleration of the rate of net diversification. The highest rate of net species diversification within the orchids (0.382 sp sp 21 My 21) is 6.8 times that at the Asparagales crown.

We propose in this paper to use three regions of plastid DNA as a standard protocol for barcoding all land plants. We review the other markers that have been proposed and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. The low levels of variation in plastid DNA make three regions necessary; there are no plastid regions, coding or non‐coding, that evolve as rapidly as mitochondrial DNA generally does in animals. We outline two, three‐region options, (1) rpoC1, rpoB and 1matK or (2) rpoC1, matK and psbA‐trnH as viable markers for land plant barcoding.

No abstract