1990
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/11.12.2211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleophilic selectivity of alkylating agents and their hypermutability in Drosophila as predictors of carcinognic potency in rodents

Abstract: The nucleophilic selectivity (Swain-Scott s constant or initial 7-alkylguanine/O6-alkylguanine ratio in DNA) of 60 alkylating agents, mostly monofunctional or cross-linking was compared to their carcinogenic potency in rodents (median TD50 estimates) and to two genotoxicity indices in Drosophila: (i) hypermutability, measured by the increased frequency of induced sex-linked recessive lethal mutations (SLRL) in a strain defective in DNA excision repair (exr-), as compared to the wild-type (exr+); (ii) relative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by previous studies with MNU (Nivard et al 1996) and DES , in which the frequency of base pair substitutions induced by O-alkylation increased in ner ± respect to ner + conditions. O-alkylation of DNA is the most signi®cant type of ENU-induced damage, from the point of view of its mutagenic eect, and it has been directly correlated with the mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of alkylating agents (Newbold et al 1980;Bartsch et al 1983;van Zeeland et al 1985;Vogel et al 1990). In spite of this, the cellular mechanisms involved in the response to Oalkylations, especially the repair systems involved, have remained uncertain in higher eukaryotic organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is supported by previous studies with MNU (Nivard et al 1996) and DES , in which the frequency of base pair substitutions induced by O-alkylation increased in ner ± respect to ner + conditions. O-alkylation of DNA is the most signi®cant type of ENU-induced damage, from the point of view of its mutagenic eect, and it has been directly correlated with the mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of alkylating agents (Newbold et al 1980;Bartsch et al 1983;van Zeeland et al 1985;Vogel et al 1990). In spite of this, the cellular mechanisms involved in the response to Oalkylations, especially the repair systems involved, have remained uncertain in higher eukaryotic organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen alkylation, although it occurs less frequently than N-alkylation (Beranek 1990), positively correlates with the induction of point mutations (Vogel and Nivard 1994), and has been correlated with the mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of alkylating agents (Newbold et al 1980;Bartsch et al 1983;van Zeeland et al 1985;Vogel et al 1990). Among the oxygen atoms in the DNA bases, O 6 -guanine is the most frequently alkylated position, followed by O 2 -thymine, O 4 -thymine, and O 2 -cytosine (Beranek 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutational spectra induced in Drosophila by MMS suggest the involvement of apurinic sites as mutagenic lesions (Vogel et al, 1990). In addition, a clear relationship exists between the extent of the DNA Nalkylation and the efficiency of the MMS to induce mitotic recombination in the Drosophila wing-spot test (Arnaiz et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of monofunctional alkylating agents, including MMS, have been associated with the formation of O-alkylated and N-alkylated DNA bases (Vogel and Nivard, 1994). The mutational spectra induced in Drosophila by MMS suggest the involvement of apurinic sites as mutagenic lesions (Vogel et al, 1990). In addition, a clear relationship exists between the extent of the DNA N-alkylation and the efficiency of the MMS to induce mitotic recombination in the Drosophila wing-spot test (Rodriquez-Arnaiz et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%