Nucleation and Growth of Bubbles Formed by Hydrogen Attack in Carbon and Low Alloy Steels

Sakai, T.; Kaji, Haruo

doi:10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.64.3_430

Cited by 11 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The measured values of density and radius of bubbles by the structural observation method on 2.25Cr-1 Mo steel have been reported. 1, [16][17][18] In the present results p s was 102N 103 times larger than that and r was about one tenth of them. The reason of these large differences is not clear, but as one cause, it is considered that there are differences in the nucleation mechanism of methane bubbles between the previous studies and the present work.…”

Section: Results Of Calculation Of Density and Radius Of Bubblescontrasting

confidence: 53%

New Method for Estimating of Radius and Density of Bubbles in Hydrogen Attacked Steel

Miyaji

Nakajima

1987

ISIJ Int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Density Synopsis Analytical equations to estimate the density and radius of bubbles formed during the incubation period of hydrogen attack in a 2.25Cr-1Mo steel were proposed, and the experiment to verify the validity of the equations was carried out. The hydrogen dif fusivity and the density change in the steel are correlated with the bubble density, ps and the bubble radius, r, as LAKE P~ =-4 z 72n4r3-P P d p-34r(_ P r= K B where, d p/p : the density change caused by bubbles dr: the thickness of shell around each bubble which acts as the trapping site of hydrogen atoms kB: the total volume of all shells LA: the mean intercept of prior austenite grains. The hydrogen diffusivity and the density change were measured for the quenched and tempered steel which was exposed to elevated temperatures in a high pressure hydrogen atmosphere. These measured values were substituted into the above equations to give values of p~ and r in good agreement with the structural observation.

show abstract

Section: Results Of Calculation Of Density and Radius Of Bubblescontrasting

confidence: 53%