2010
DOI: 10.1021/pr901069d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Proteome Dynamics in Differentiating Embryonic Carcinoma (NTERA-2) Cells

Abstract: The use of stem cells for generating cell types suitable for therapy is dependent on understanding the mechanisms, and identifying biomarkers, that control cell fate into different lineages. In this study, we aimed to characterize the nuclear protein dynamics of NTERA-2 cells undergoing retinoic acid-induced differentiation. We focused specifically on the first six days of differentiation, to provide insight into the earliest differentiation events, and employed techniques to specifically monitor the nuclear p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current neurite outgrowth models routinely used within neuroscience research generally utilise the differentiation of cell monolayer cultures, whether it be of stem cells (Tegengem et al., 2011, Satoh et al., 1997, Pewsey et al., 2010, Roloff et al., 2015), cancer cells (Ferrari-Toninelli et al., 2004, Tucholski et al., 2001, Ross et al., 1983) or primary animal derived cells (Clagett-Dame et al., 2006, Balgude et al., 2001, Fitzgerald et al., 1993). However, quantification of neurite outgrowth in populations of cells grown as monolayers can be challenging using image analysis software, as it can be difficult to individually trace each neurite back to its parent cell body within an intricate neurite network (Radio and Mundy, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current neurite outgrowth models routinely used within neuroscience research generally utilise the differentiation of cell monolayer cultures, whether it be of stem cells (Tegengem et al., 2011, Satoh et al., 1997, Pewsey et al., 2010, Roloff et al., 2015), cancer cells (Ferrari-Toninelli et al., 2004, Tucholski et al., 2001, Ross et al., 1983) or primary animal derived cells (Clagett-Dame et al., 2006, Balgude et al., 2001, Fitzgerald et al., 1993). However, quantification of neurite outgrowth in populations of cells grown as monolayers can be challenging using image analysis software, as it can be difficult to individually trace each neurite back to its parent cell body within an intricate neurite network (Radio and Mundy, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The embryonal carcinoma (EC) stem cell line, TERA2, readily differentiates into neuronal subtypes when exposed to ATRA. EC cells are the malignant counterpart of embryonic stem cells, and cells from the TERA2 lineage have provided the basis for many in vitro models of neural differentiation, function and neurite outgrowth (Tegengem et al., 2011, Satoh et al., 1997, Pewsey et al., 2010, Roloff et al., 2015, Przyborski, 2001, Przyborski et al., 2000, Przyborski et al., 2003, Przyborski et al., 2004, Stewart et al., 2004, Coyne et al., 2011). While such models are valuable, there is significant scope to enhance their reliability in terms of robustness and reproducibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, bioinformatics tools are used to predict the interaction partners of the regulated proteins. This approach has been used for temporal examination of planktonic and biofilm proteomes, the signaling upon brain injury, the differentiation in embryonic carcinoma cells, and the protein interactions related to tyrosine phosphorylation . Interaction maps have been created using bioinformatics tools such as Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) and Highly Multiplexed Amplicon‐based Phylogenomics (HiMAP) .…”
Section: Protein–protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction maps have been created using bioinformatics tools such as Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) and Highly Multiplexed Amplicon‐based Phylogenomics (HiMAP) . The results are then presented as network clusters, and the most advanced one (which also involves the time aspect) was presented by Pewsey et al . Taking Figure as one example, the importance of time in interactomics studies are clearly visualized.…”
Section: Protein–protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation