2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear properties for astrophysical and radioactive-ion-beam applications (II)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
161
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
10
161
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This network uses state-of-the-art nuclear physics inputs (e.g. Mumpower et al 2016Mumpower et al , 2017Möller et al 2019), including a robust treatment of capture rates as well as neutron-induced and β-delayed fission using a single theoretical framework (Mumpower et al 2018). Variation in uncertain nuclear properties, such as those from nuclear binding energies proceeds as in Mumpower et al (2015).…”
Section: Gamma-rays From R-process Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This network uses state-of-the-art nuclear physics inputs (e.g. Mumpower et al 2016Mumpower et al , 2017Möller et al 2019), including a robust treatment of capture rates as well as neutron-induced and β-delayed fission using a single theoretical framework (Mumpower et al 2018). Variation in uncertain nuclear properties, such as those from nuclear binding energies proceeds as in Mumpower et al (2015).…”
Section: Gamma-rays From R-process Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model which better reproduces the 136 Sb data is the KTUY [49] but the half-life predicted for 136 Te remains far from the experimental value. Regarding the QRPA-HF [51] model, it is the one which better reproduces the P 1n and P 2n values for both isotopes according the obtained experimental results.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The P 1n and P 2n values obtained in this work are summarized in Table V together with the previously available experimental values and theoretical predictions from several models, including the finite-range droplet model plus the quasiparticle random-phase approximation (FRDM+QRPA) [13], the density functional theory plus continuum QRPA plus relativistic QRPA(DF3+cQRPA+RQRPA) [47,48], the Koura-Tachibana-Uno-Yamada (KTUY) [49], the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov plus RQRPA (RHB+RQRPA) [50], the QRPA plus Hartree-Fock (QRPA-HF) [51], and the semi-empirical effective density model [52]. The P 1n value obtained for 136 Te, 1.47(6)%, is higher but in fair agreement with those reported in Refs.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, new data points are of critical importance. The predictions for the 86 Ga [5][6][7][8][9] range between 21% and 56% for P 1n and 7% and 44% for P 2n and it is difficult to judge their reliability based on a single data point, particularly when β3n or β4n decay becomes significant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the nuclear half-lives for Ga isotopes are relatively long despite the large Q β values reflect the concentration of the B(GT) in highly excited neutronemitting states in Ge isotopes. The model by Möller et al [5,9] uses QRPA calculations to make predictions of P 1n,2n values and the model in principle reflects very similar shell-structure effects. The details of the model will result in a different strength distribution and delayed neutron emission probabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%