1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf01022453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear orientation and resonance studies of96TcFe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to refute the arguments against "low-field" resonance shifts [8][9], the measurements were made in an external magnetic field up to 2.0 T. Additional NMR-ON resonance shift measurements were performed with isotopes (6~ 52Mn) for which the g-factors are well-known and the resonance shifts can be predicted. Here we show that the resonance shift data of [5] on 94'9STcFe could be confirmed; the new data are more precise and per se consistent, including now also 96TcFe, for which a different resonance shift had been reported in the literature [3].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to refute the arguments against "low-field" resonance shifts [8][9], the measurements were made in an external magnetic field up to 2.0 T. Additional NMR-ON resonance shift measurements were performed with isotopes (6~ 52Mn) for which the g-factors are well-known and the resonance shifts can be predicted. Here we show that the resonance shift data of [5] on 94'9STcFe could be confirmed; the new data are more precise and per se consistent, including now also 96TcFe, for which a different resonance shift had been reported in the literature [3].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It is obvious that the published resonance shift data for 96TcFe [3] are erroneous. Now, all resonance shift data for Tc in Fe are per se consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation