2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear magnetic resonance at millitesla fields using a zero-field spectrometer

Abstract: We describe new analytical capabilities for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments in which signal detection is performed with chemical resolution (via spin-spin J couplings) in the zero to ultra-low magnetic field region, below 1μT. Using magnetic fields in the 100μT to 1mT range, we demonstrate the implementation of conventional NMR pulse sequences with spin-species selectivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although HP NMR spectroscopy has been reported in the ZULF regime [37, 66, 67] including frequency-selective RF excitation [67], the use of conventional MRI frequency encoding in ZULF potentially is challenging due to the very low resonance frequency, and new MRI encoding techniques likely need to be developed. However, 13 C (as well as 1 H, 3 He and 129 Xe) MRI imaging can be performed at B 0 > 6 mT (including ~48.7 mT, the field studied here) as has been demonstrated by us [15, 52, 6870] and others [8, 19, 20, 7175] previously using conventional MRI approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although HP NMR spectroscopy has been reported in the ZULF regime [37, 66, 67] including frequency-selective RF excitation [67], the use of conventional MRI frequency encoding in ZULF potentially is challenging due to the very low resonance frequency, and new MRI encoding techniques likely need to be developed. However, 13 C (as well as 1 H, 3 He and 129 Xe) MRI imaging can be performed at B 0 > 6 mT (including ~48.7 mT, the field studied here) as has been demonstrated by us [15, 52, 6870] and others [8, 19, 20, 7175] previously using conventional MRI approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, lowering the field strength confers the benefit of reducing SAR to potentially negligible levels [11], which not only alleviates patient safety concerns, but can also lead to design and implementation of faster pulse sequences by permitting use of RF pulses for echoes instead of gradient echoes [11]. Third, through utilizing long-lived spin states (LLSS) [2536] or taking advantage of reduced contributions from chemical shift anisotropy particularly below 0.1 T [37], hyperpolarized state lifetimes can significantly extend for protons and/or heteronuclei at low magnetic fields. Fourth, experimental validation of the theoretical equations for low-field NMR and MRI [12, 13] sensitivity for hyperpolarized states has favorably corroborated the weak frequency dependence of hyperpolarized state detection, where these theories indicate the potential for approaching or even exceeding the sensitivity of high-field NMR/MRI [12, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also imaging in the vicinity of metals is possible without distortion artefacts 35 . The sensitivity of different magnetic field detectors used for ULF MRI 36 , 37 , such as for example atomic magnetometers, is comparable to the already widely used SQUIDs. A SQUID-based system has not only a higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) compared to a system using a Faraday coil at ULF 38 , but also can detect the NMR signal of multiple nuclei simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 Given the fact that achieving homogeneity is easier at zero field than at high field, ZULF NMR is a suitable technique for distinguishing molecules in liquid state and detecting and characterizing weak physical interactions. While ZULF NMR measurements can be performed on samples initially prepolarized by placing them in a permanent magnet before the measurement, 36 the downside of this approach is that the sample has to be shuttled. This hinders measurements during and shortly after prepolarization and limits polarization values to only ∼ 10 −6 , insufficient for many problems at hand.…”
Section: In Situ Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%