2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear isospin effect on α -decay half-lives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more direct evidence is that is positively correl- ated with isospin asymmetry of parent nuclei having the same values [2]. Isospin asymmetry is an important factor affecting the density distribution of protons and neutrons, which is expected to play a more important role in the preformation of the nucleus [17,[36][37][38][39][40]. This leads us to consider that isospin asymmetry may be a key for determination of preformation factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more direct evidence is that is positively correl- ated with isospin asymmetry of parent nuclei having the same values [2]. Isospin asymmetry is an important factor affecting the density distribution of protons and neutrons, which is expected to play a more important role in the preformation of the nucleus [17,[36][37][38][39][40]. This leads us to consider that isospin asymmetry may be a key for determination of preformation factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x i is the i th reading of data set, υ is the mean of the data set. We found that NMHF has minimum RMSE (0.56) and uncertainties (±0.09 s) as tested it on 40 experimental data within the range 111≤Z≤118 and 161≤N≤192 while compared to other similar, latest fitted and known formulas such as Royer2020 [92], MYQZR2019 [91], Akrawy2018 [93], Modified RenB2019 [89], MRF2018 [95], DK2018 [95], Modified Budaca Formula (MBuF2022) [37], UF2022 [96], IUF2022 [97], ISEF2022 [98], new modified Sobiczewski formula (NMSF2021) [38] and new modified Manjunatha formula (NMMF2021) [38]. Consequently, the present calculations of α-decay half-lives are performed by using NMHF [38] which incorporates the terms related to (i) angular momentum taken away by the α-particle and (ii) asymmetry of the parent nucleus.…”
Section: α-Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the selection of α-decay half-lives formula, we have tested few recently fitted/modified empirical/semiempirical formulas [25,34,37,38,60,[89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] and the comparison among these formulas is shown in Table 1. For the comparison, we use root mean square error (RMSE) and uncertainty (u), which are calculated by using the following formulas:…”
Section: α-Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A semiempirical relation was suggested by Poenaru and Ivascu [14] for the alpha decay fission theory for all groups of nuclei. Moreover, the half-lives for e-e, e-o, o-e, and o-o nuclei with alpha decay in the range 52 118 have been tested within the Royer modified formula including new Royer coefficients obtained by the fitting of 356 isotopes [15]. Superheavy isotopes probe the extremes of the structure of nuclei with respect to the mass number of nuclei for a bound system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%